Skip to main content
Glama
sachinbkale27

Image Label MCP Server

by sachinbkale27
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
Python
Remote

Related Servers

Alternatives to Image Label MCP Server

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • openrouter-image-mcp

      skelly-77
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables Claude to generate and edit images through a live-discovered model catalog, including masked edits and exact output sizes, with browser-based sign-in and cost-annotated saved results. It runs locally over stdio and stores images in a configurable directory.
      7
      MIT

    • Luma MCP

      Dimitrism23023
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables AI coding assistants without native vision to analyze screenshots, errors, UI designs, and documents through a unified image understanding tool backed by multiple vision model providers. Supports local files, remote URLs, Data URIs, OCR, multi-crop processing, and stdio or HTTP deployment for shared access.
      404 npm
      MIT
    • Reflow Studio MCP Server by reflow-automations

      Reflow Studio MCP Serverofficial

      reflow-automations
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Lets AI agents generate images and videos through a self-hosted studio connected to the user's own fal.ai, Kie.ai or Higgsfield API keys, with tools for exploring models, submitting image and video jobs, waiting on results and importing media from URLs. Runs over HTTP with bearer-token authentication, so agents such as Claude Code, Codex, Cursor or Claude Desktop can create and retrieve media while provider keys stay encrypted server-side.
      MIT
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    A3.7/5.0

    Scored across 8 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool has a clearly distinct purpose: list vs get for retrieval, update_metadata for metadata, add/replace/remove for annotation modification, upload for ingestion, and export for output. The three annotation mutation tools are explicitly differentiated by their append, replace-all, and remove-by-id behaviors.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All eight tools follow a consistent snake_case verb_noun pattern (list_images, get_image, update_image_metadata, add_annotations, replace_annotations, remove_annotations, upload_image, export_annotations). There are no mixed conventions or vague verbs.

    Tool Count5/5

    Eight tools is well-scoped for an image labeling server, covering image retrieval, metadata updates, annotation lifecycle, upload, and export without bloat. Each tool earns its place in the core workflow.

    Completeness4/5

    The server covers image upload/list/get, metadata update, full annotation add/replace/remove, and export. A delete-image operation is missing, and category management is absent, but these are minor gaps for the stated annotation-focused purpose.

    Maintenance

    ActivityNo data
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources