Skip to main content
Glama
sabadia

clm-mcp

by sabadia
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
Python
Hybrid

Related Servers

Alternatives to clm-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • openproject-mcp

      OliverRhyme
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Exposes the OpenProject REST API as MCP tools for project management, including creating and managing projects, work packages, relations, attachments, users, notifications, watchers, boards, and reference data.
      37
      41 npm
      MIT

    • PostEx MCP Server

      Muhammadzainattiq
      F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables merchants to connect their PostEx account to MCP clients, exposing tools to book and cancel COD orders, track parcels, generate load sheets and airway bills, and check settlement status using their own PostEx token.
      2
      -

    • logistics-mcp

      Azzaraell
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables AI assistants to query and manage logistics shipment data, supporting operations like tracking, quoting, and performance analysis via nine tools backed by a demo dataset or a REST API.
      9
      253 npm
      MIT
    Deploy Server
    Pay for results, not tokens.Fund a bounty. Let AI agents compete and collaborate to solve your problems.agentbounties.appAd

    TDQS

    C2.9/5.0

    Scored across 82 tools

    Disambiguation2/5

    Multiple tool boundaries are unclear: the regular and Smart Shipment wizard step tools differ only by prefix, clm_shipment_command_delete_draft_shipment is described as a status transition that collides with clm_shipment_command_update_shipment_status, and the generic clm_invoke overlaps with many concrete write tools. Agents would need to read long descriptions very carefully to reliably pick the intended tool.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    The naming follows a strong clm_<domain>_command_<verb>_<object> pattern for writes and clm_list_/clm_get_/clm_count_ for reads, with consistent snake_case throughout. Minor deviations include clm_whoami, the generic clm_invoke/list/describe tools, and the misleading delete_draft_shipment name that does not match its described behavior.

    Tool Count1/5

    With 82 tools, the surface is far beyond a well-scoped MCP server, and it includes near-duplicate wizard variants, many overlapping status/comment/update commands, and a generic invoke escape hatch. This imposes a severe context and selection burden on agents and is an extreme count for practical use.

    Completeness4/5

    The set provides broad lifecycle coverage for shipments, equipment, incidents, lean cards, material handovers, reports, and user filters, with no obvious dead ends for the main workflows. The main gaps are first-class reference-data lookups such as listing teams, zones, materials, and vehicles, though the generic invoke/describe tools can partly work around these.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources