philosophy-mcp
Related Servers
Alternatives to philosophy-mcp
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceMCP server for searching and retrieving philosophy papers, combining Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Unpaywall, CrossRef, and PhilArchive with PDF resolution, taxonomy browsing, and a personal library.187 npmMIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceMultilingual sentence corpus MCP server. Enables search, retrieval, and translation of sentences across many languages.278 npmMIT
- AlicenseAqualityBmaintenanceMCP server for the Meta-Consciousness (MCAI) theory: term definitions, concept relations and source citations, served from a local knowledge base.25MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceMCP server for interacting with the Phiacta knowledge platform.12 npmGPL 3.0
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceSemantic search and comparative retrieval over a multi-tradition corpus of sacred and foundational texts, exposed as an MCP server.MIT
- AlicenseAqualityBmaintenanceSelf-hosted read-only MCP server over a local library of ancient-text corpora — 2.47M documents and 118M passages from 258 sources (cuneiform, Classical, biblical, medieval and more), with the license class tracked on every passage. 14 research tools: full-text search, concordance, passage display, dictionary definitions, etymologies, cognates, parallel passages, text alignment, place lookup etc143MIT
TDQS
Scored across 13 tools
Each tool has a clearly distinct purpose: search vs. list vs. get for different content types (thinkers, articles, glossary, syntheses), plus a general full-text search and corpus stats. No two tools have ambiguous boundaries.
Tool names mix Portuguese and English ('buscar_pensador' vs 'search_artigos', 'get_artigo' vs 'listar_artigos'), use different verb prefixes ('get_', 'listar_', 'search_', 'buscar_'), and one tool uses snake_case English ('corpus_stats'). This inconsistency makes it hard to predict tool names.
13 tools cover the main content types (articles, thinkers, glossary, syntheses) with search, list, and retrieval operations, plus a stats tool. The count is well-scoped for a philosophy reference server; each tool earns its place.
The tool surface provides full read-only access to the philosophy corpus: search across all sections, retrieve individual items, list all items, and get corpus statistics. No obvious gaps for the intended purpose of referencing philosophical content.