Skip to main content
Glama
Sign In
actual-mcp

actual-mcp

by s-stefanov
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
TypeScript

Related Servers

Alternatives to actual-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • actual-mcp-server

      agigante80
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      MCP server that connects AI assistants to Actual Budget for budget management, enabling natural language queries, transaction creation, and spending analysis.
      2,479 npm
      76
      MIT

    • actual-budget-mcp

      henfrydls
      A
      license
      B
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      An MCP server that connects Actual Budget to Claude, enabling users to manage budgets, transactions, and spending insights through natural language.
      37
      452 npm
      20
      MIT

    • ynab-mcp

      EthanKang1
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A Model Context Protocol (MCP) server for interacting with YNAB (You Need A Budget). Provides tools for accessing budget data through MCP-enabled clients like Claude Desktop.
      4
      MIT

    • ynab-mcp-server

      Gregarrific
      F
      license
      B
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A personal MCP server that gives Claude native access to YNAB budget data.
      46
      -

    • monarch-mcp

      bkichler
      F
      license
      B
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      MCP server that bridges Claude to Monarch Money for personal-finance analysis and lightweight edits.
      18
      -

    • actual-budget-mcp

      Saikumarmohan
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      MCP server for Actual Budget that enables AI agents to read accounts, transactions, categories, and budgets, as well as create and update transactions and transfers.
      11
      1
      MIT
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    B3.2/5.0

    Scored across 17 tools

    Disambiguation3/5

    Most tools have distinct reporting purposes, but monthly-summary and cash-flow both cover income/expenses, while balance-history and net-worth both track balances over time. Several category-spending tools also overlap conceptually, though their descriptions help differentiate them.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    All names use consistent kebab-case, which is predictable and readable. However, action naming is mixed: retrieval tools use a get- prefix while reporting tools omit it, creating a minor inconsistency.

    Tool Count4/5

    17 tools is slightly heavy for a finance reporting server, but each tool covers a meaningful reporting dimension such as categories, payees, cash flow, net worth, and budget months. There is little obvious filler, though some overlap exists.

    Completeness3/5

    The surface is entirely read-only and covers many reporting and retrieval views, but it lacks create/update/delete operations for transactions, accounts, payees, and budgets. If the server is intentionally read-only, coverage is good; otherwise it has notable lifecycle gaps.

    Maintenance

    ActivityActive
    ResponsivenessSlow

    Resources