Skip to main content
Glama
s-n-n

Edge TTS MCP

by s-n-n
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
Python
Local

Related Servers

Alternatives to Edge TTS MCP

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • Edge TTS MCP

      Hwenyi
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      An MCP server that converts text into lifelike speech using Microsoft Edge's Text-to-Speech service, supporting customizable voice, rate, volume, and pitch.
      4
      MIT

    • TTS-MCP

      nakamurau1
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      A Model Context Protocol server that integrates high-quality text-to-speech capabilities with Claude Desktop and other MCP-compatible clients, supporting multiple voice options and audio formats.
      17 npm
      1
      MIT

    • Edge-TTS MCP Server

      yangwuan55
      F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      An MCP server that leverages the Microsoft Edge TTS service to provide high-quality text-to-speech capabilities across over 80 languages. It enables users to generate audio files, query available voices, and create subtitle files using natural language commands.
      -

    • SpeakUp MCP Server

      zachswift615
      F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      An MCP server that gives Claude Code text-to-speech capabilities with support for multiple simultaneous instances, message queuing, and a web UI for monitoring.
      1
      -
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    A3.8/5.0

    Scored across 3 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool has a clearly distinct purpose with no overlap: get_config retrieves settings, list_available_voices provides voice options, and speak performs the core TTS function. The descriptions make it impossible to confuse these three tools.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All tools follow a consistent verb_noun pattern (get_config, list_available_voices, speak) with clear, descriptive names. The naming convention is uniform throughout the set with no deviations.

    Tool Count5/5

    Three tools is perfectly appropriate for a TTS server's scope: configuration management, voice discovery, and the core speak functionality. Each tool earns its place without being excessive or insufficient.

    Completeness5/5

    The tool surface provides complete coverage for the TTS domain: configuration retrieval, voice listing with filtering, and comprehensive speech generation with all key parameters (text, voice, rate, volume, pitch). There are no obvious gaps for typical TTS workflows.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources