Skip to main content
Glama
s-morgan-jeffries

OmniFocus MCP Server

by s-morgan-jeffries
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
Python
Local

Related Servers

Alternatives to OmniFocus MCP Server

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • OmniFocus MCP

      fortin
      A
      license
      B
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables AI assistants to plan, capture, and organize work in OmniFocus on macOS, with tools for querying and managing tasks, projects, tags, perspectives, and session state.
      25
      MIT

    • OmniFocus MCP Server

      mojenmojen
      F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables AI-powered task management in OmniFocus with support for project reviews, planned dates, repeating tasks, custom perspectives, hierarchical subtasks, and advanced filtering. Perfect for Claude AI integration with comprehensive CRUD operations for tasks, projects, and folders.
      2
      -

    • OmniFocus MCP Plus

      psufka
      A
      license
      B
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      A comprehensive MCP server for OmniFocus 4 on macOS featuring 34 tools for task management, project organization, and advanced filtering. It enables full CRUD operations for tasks, projects, folders, and tags while supporting custom perspectives and complex repetition rules.
      53
      5
      MIT

    • omnifocus-mcp

      torsday
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Gives MCP-compatible AI assistants full, typed access to OmniFocus on macOS, enabling task management, project manipulation, inbox processing, and more via natural language.
      100
      21 npm
      1
      MIT
    Deploy Server
    Pay for results, not tokens.Fund a bounty. Let AI agents compete and collaborate to solve your problems.agentbounties.appAd

    TDQS

    A3.5/5.0

    Scored across 21 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool targets a distinct entity or action (folders, projects, tags, tasks, focus, perspectives) with clear CRUD separation. No two tools have overlapping purposes.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All tools follow a consistent verb_noun pattern, using plural for collections (create_folders, get_projects) and singular for singular concepts (get_focus, switch_perspective). No mixing of conventions.

    Tool Count4/5

    21 tools is slightly above the typical range but well-justified by the domain's complexity, covering multiple entities and operations like reordering and focus management. Still feels well-scoped without redundancy.

    Completeness4/5

    CRUD operations for all main entities exist, plus focus and perspective management. Minor gaps like perspective CRUD or advanced note handling are absent but core task management workflows are fully covered.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessUnresponsive

    Resources