Skip to main content
Glama
ryotaro-tanaka

mcp-oss-onramp

by ryotaro-tanaka
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
JavaScript
Local

Related Servers

Alternatives to mcp-oss-onramp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • gfi-scout

      Rajveerx11
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      MCP server that finds beginner-friendly GitHub issues ranked by likelihood of successful contribution, with repo health scoring and issue status checks via the GitHub API.
      4
      MIT

    • DevPilot MCP

      Ashbruh22
      F
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      This MCP server gives AI coding agents structured, scoped access to GitHub issues, a codebase, its docs, and its test suite, enabling issue triage, code search, test execution, and failure analysis in one workflow. It provides deterministic tools for fetching and analyzing issues, searching code, reading documentation, running tests, and summarizing failures.
      6
      -

    • devflow-mcp

      boranesn
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A production-ready MCP server that provides AI assistants with comprehensive GitHub developer tooling including PR analysis, code review, changelog generation, dependency auditing, commit summarization, and refactoring suggestions.
      8 npm
      ISC

    • gitea-mcp

      werebear73
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      An MCP server that enables AI assistants to read, create, and manage issues, repositories, and releases on Gitea, Forgejo, or Codeberg instances via personal access tokens.
      21
      141 PyPI
      1
      MIT
    Deploy Server
    Shareable, User-Owned Context BackendPeople, applications, and agents read, write, and coordinate together in one context lake. Reach it over MCP, a CLI, a Python SDK, or REST.fulcradynamics.comAd

    TDQS

    A3.9/5.0

    Scored across 1 tool

    Disambiguation5/5

    With only one tool, there is no possibility of confusion or overlap. The tool's purpose is distinct and well-defined.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    The single tool name 'scout_issues' follows a clear verb_noun pattern. Consistency is inherently maintained with one tool.

    Tool Count2/5

    Having only one tool is too few for the apparent scope of an OSS onboarding server. It feels thin and limits functionality.

    Completeness2/5

    The server covers only scouting for issues, missing other essential operations like fetching issue details or interacting with issues. This leaves significant gaps for a comprehensive tool set.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessResponsive

    Resources