voice-memory MCP server
Related Servers
Alternatives to voice-memory MCP server
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceExposes one SQLite-backed notes store over both stdio and an HTTPS/SSE endpoint, letting Claude Code, Claude Desktop, Claude web, and Claude mobile read and write the same shared state with full-text search. Provides write, read, search, and list tools so a note created on one surface is immediately visible from any other.285 npm1MIT
- AlicenseAqualityBmaintenanceEnables users to create, retrieve, update, delete, and full-text search a local knowledge base of notes persisted in SQLite with FTS5, exposed over stdio or authenticated Streamable HTTP. It also surfaces recent/single-note resources and prompts for summarizing notes and drafting replies.5MIT
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceProvides AI assistants with tools to create, list, search, tag, and delete notes stored in a local SQLite database.-
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceEnables to create notebooks and notes with tags, and perform full-text search across notes using FTS5 syntax, all stored locally in SQLite.-
- AlicenseAqualityCmaintenanceEnables coding agents to persist notes, decisions, requirements, and learnings per project in SQLite and retrieve them across sessions via search and status tools.3MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceA lightweight journal/memory system for Claude Code with no ML dependencies, using SQLite for fast local storage.6MIT
TDQS
Scored across 5 tools
Each tool has a clearly distinct access pattern: single-by-ID retrieval (get_voice_memory), keyword search (search_voice_memories), recency listing (get_recent_memories), tag enumeration (list_voice_tags), and write (save_voice_memory). An agent can easily choose between search vs. recent vs. get-by-UUID based on descriptions.
All tools follow a verb_noun pattern (get_, search_, list_, save_), which is consistent. Minor deviation: the noun form shifts between 'voice_memory', 'voice_memories', 'recent_memories', and 'voice_tags', which is readable but not perfectly uniform.
Five tools is well-scoped for a voice-memory store: one write, three read/query paths, and one tag-listing helper. Each tool earns its place without redundancy.
The read/create and search surface is solid, but there is no update or delete operation for memories, and no way to manage tags directly. For a memory store these are notable gaps that could cause dead ends if an agent needs to correct or remove a record.