Skip to main content
Glama
ryo823

voice-memory MCP server

by ryo823

Related Servers

Alternatives to voice-memory MCP server

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Exposes one SQLite-backed notes store over both stdio and an HTTPS/SSE endpoint, letting Claude Code, Claude Desktop, Claude web, and Claude mobile read and write the same shared state with full-text search. Provides write, read, search, and list tools so a note created on one surface is immediately visible from any other.
      285 npm
      1
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables users to create, retrieve, update, delete, and full-text search a local knowledge base of notes persisted in SQLite with FTS5, exposed over stdio or authenticated Streamable HTTP. It also surfaces recent/single-note resources and prompts for summarizing notes and drafting replies.
      5
      MIT
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Provides AI assistants with tools to create, list, search, tag, and delete notes stored in a local SQLite database.
      -

    TDQS

    A3.9/5.0

    Scored across 5 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool has a clearly distinct access pattern: single-by-ID retrieval (get_voice_memory), keyword search (search_voice_memories), recency listing (get_recent_memories), tag enumeration (list_voice_tags), and write (save_voice_memory). An agent can easily choose between search vs. recent vs. get-by-UUID based on descriptions.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    All tools follow a verb_noun pattern (get_, search_, list_, save_), which is consistent. Minor deviation: the noun form shifts between 'voice_memory', 'voice_memories', 'recent_memories', and 'voice_tags', which is readable but not perfectly uniform.

    Tool Count5/5

    Five tools is well-scoped for a voice-memory store: one write, three read/query paths, and one tag-listing helper. Each tool earns its place without redundancy.

    Completeness3/5

    The read/create and search surface is solid, but there is no update or delete operation for memories, and no way to manage tags directly. For a memory store these are notable gaps that could cause dead ends if an agent needs to correct or remove a record.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues