Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to OpenFilings

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Hosted MCP server providing read-only access to US public company fundamentals, segment breakdowns, peer comparisons, and earnings data sourced directly from SEC filings.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      MCP server for querying US federal contracts and public company financial data from USAspending and SEC EDGAR. Enables searching expiring contracts, screening companies by metrics, and retrieving financial histories.
      4
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      An MCP server that wraps SEC EDGAR APIs to provide company financial data, screening metrics, and disclosure signals for investment diligence, with every figure traced to its source filing.
      8
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      MCP server for Chinese A-share (Shanghai/Shenzhen/Beijing) financial statements: pull annual reports, run 4 industry-aware accounting cross-checks, and peer-compare companies with derived avg-equity ROE.
      3
      5
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      MCP server to fetch Vietnamese corporate financial reports (balance sheet, income statement, cash flow) from cafef.vn using public API, no PDF or OCR needed.
      3
      7 npm
      1
      MIT

    TDQS

    B3/5.0

    Scored across 22 tools

    Disambiguation3/5

    Most tools target distinct resources or actions, but filing_outline and filing_sections are nearly identical, both returning headings without section bodies. Additionally, filing_read, filing_markdown, and filing_search could be confused if descriptions are not carefully read, though their purposes are subtly different.

    Naming Consistency3/5

    Tool names mostly follow an object-first pattern (e.g., filings_list, companies_search), but the action placement is inconsistent—sometimes at the end (filings_diff, financials_query) and sometimes absent or noun-based (filing_outline, company_research_brief, company_facts). This mix makes the naming less predictable than a uniform verb_noun scheme.

    Tool Count4/5

    22 tools is on the higher end but appropriate for a comprehensive filings domain that spans company research, filing retrieval, structured financial queries, ownership data, and historical backfill. The count is not excessive given the breadth, though one redundant tool pair slightly inflates it.

    Completeness4/5

    The tool set covers the core workflows: locating companies, listing and reading filings, extracting structured financial facts, comparing filings, and monitoring new submissions. It also includes an import tool for external filings. Minor gaps exist (e.g., no full-text search for insider dealings), but the surface is largely complete for the intended use.

    Maintenance

    ActivitySlowing
    ResponsivenessUnresponsive