Tato Runtime
Related Servers
Alternatives to Tato Runtime
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseBqualityBmaintenanceEnables AI agents to observe and control local browsers and desktop applications over MCP, including reading UI elements and differences, capturing images, and performing permitted clicks, typing, selections, scrolling, and multi-window operations.162MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceEnables AI agents to automate both web browsers and native desktop applications through a unified interface, supporting tasks like browsing, clicking, typing, and file clipboard operations via exposed MCP tools.1Apache 2.0
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceEnables AI agents to observe and control the user's live desktop by listing apps, reading accessibility trees, and performing clicks, typing, scrolling, dragging, and other input actions with per-action approvals and local audit archives.1MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceGives MCP-compatible AI agents a local, observable control plane for Edge, Chrome/Chromium, and Firefox, combining DOM/accessibility, screenshots, Windows UI Automation, and real mouse/keyboard input with verification, approvals, and audit logging.MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceEnables AI agents to view and control the local desktop through browser-based viewport and MCP tools.MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceEnables AI agents to control Windows and macOS desktops through MCP or the command line by taking screenshots and performing clicks, typing, scrolling, and dragging.MIT
TDQS
Scored across 3 tools
The three tools target mostly distinct domains: browser for website tasks, computador for desktop programs, and gravacao for screen recording. However, the computador and browser tools overlap when the computer tool navigates Chrome or when both perform click/type/scroll, which is why descriptions must explicitly say 'site tasks go better through browser' to keep them apart.
Names are domain nouns rather than a verb_noun pattern, and the set mixes English (browser) with Portuguese (gravacao, computador). Still readable and each name maps to a clear domain, but the convention is inconsistent.
Three tools for a screen-control runtime (browser, desktop, recording) is well-scoped and each earns its place. The tradeoff is that each tool is heavily overloaded with many internal sub-actions, which is more of a design style than a count problem.
Coverage is broad: navigation, reading, clicking, typing, scrolling, scripting, program management, keyboard shortcuts, drag, recording, and human handoff/approval flows are all present. Minor gaps like explicit file upload/download handling exist but core lifecycle operations are covered.