Skip to main content
Glama
ryanduguid

Aus Accounting MCP

Get the Division 7A benchmark rate

get_div7a_benchmark_rate
Read-onlyIdempotent

Retrieve the reviewed Division 7A benchmark rate for a given income year, or get UNKNOWN when outside the frozen table. Supports summary or full provenance details.

Instructions

Return the reviewed s 109N(2) rate for a year, or UNKNOWN.

Years use the YYYY-YY form, such as 2026-27. The delegated engine fails closed outside its reviewed frozen table and does not read the network. response_detail defaults to summary; pass full for the complete provenance and statutory trace. Use review_div7a_loan to review supplied loan facts. Returns cited data without writes; not advice or a live rate lookup.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
year_of_incomeYesIncome year being reviewed, YYYY-YY, e.g. "2025-26". Years outside the engine reviewed rate table return UNKNOWN.
response_detailNo"summary" (default) returns the concise result; "full" includes the complete engine audit and provenance.summary

Output Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault

No arguments

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. Changed7 schema fields changedv0.1.13
    • addedInput schema / properties / year_of_income / maxLength
      Added value: +7
    • addedOutput schema / $defs / Manifest
      Added value: +{
      +  "additionalProperties": true,
      +  "description": "Which statutory tables a figure was computed from, and their digests.",
      +  "properties": {
      +    "rate_table_uris": {
      +      "description": "Statutory rate tables this answer consumed, each with the digest of what was read. Empty when no rate table was consulted.",
      +      "items": {
      +        "$ref": "#/$defs/RateTableSource"
      +      },
      +      "title": "Rate Table Uris",
      +      "type": "array"
      +    }
      +  },
      +  "required": [
      +    "rate_table_uris"
      +  ],
      +  "title": "Manifest",
      +  "type": "object"
      +}
    • addedOutput schema / $defs / RateFull / properties / manifest
      Added value: +{
      +  "$ref": "#/$defs/Manifest"
      +}
    • changedOutput schema / $defs / RateFull / required
      Previous value: -[
      -  "ok",
      -  "engine",
      -  "engine_version",
      -  "law_content_date",
      -  "law_compilation",
      -  "disclaimer",
      -  "year_of_income",
      -  "verdict",
      -  "benchmark_rate",
      -  "reason",
      -  "provenance",
      -  "statutory_trace"
      -]New value: +[
      +  "ok",
      +  "engine",
      +  "engine_version",
      +  "law_content_date",
      +  "law_compilation",
      +  "disclaimer",
      +  "year_of_income",
      +  "verdict",
      +  "benchmark_rate",
      +  "reason",
      +  "provenance",
      +  "manifest",
      +  "statutory_trace"
      +]
    • addedOutput schema / $defs / RateTableSource
      Added value: +{
      +  "additionalProperties": true,
      +  "properties": {
      +    "sha256": {
      +      "description": "SHA-256 of the table text the figure was computed from.",
      +      "title": "Sha256",
      +      "type": "string"
      +    },
      +    "uri": {
      +      "description": "The rate table the engine read.",
      +      "title": "Uri",
      +      "type": "string"
      +    }
      +  },
      +  "required": [
      +    "uri",
      +    "sha256"
      +  ],
      +  "title": "RateTableSource",
      +  "type": "object"
      +}
    • addedOutput schema / $defs / VerificationSource / properties / rate_table_uris
      Added value: +{
      +  "description": "Statutory rate tables this answer consumed, each with the digest of what was read. Empty when the figure came from the request alone.",
      +  "items": {
      +    "$ref": "#/$defs/RateTableSource"
      +  },
      +  "title": "Rate Table Uris",
      +  "type": "array"
      +}
    • changedOutput schema / $defs / VerificationSource / required
      Previous value: -[
      -  "verify_at"
      -]New value: +[
      +  "verify_at",
      +  "rate_table_uris"
      +]
  2. Changed1 schema field changedv0.1.10
    • addedInput schema / additionalProperties
      Added value: +false
  3. Changed4 schema fields changedv0.1.8
    • addedOutput schema / $defs
      Added value: +{
      +  "RateFull": {
      +    "additionalProperties": true,
      +    "not": {
      +      "required": [
      +        "response_detail"
      +      ]
      +    },
      +    "properties": {
      +      "benchmark_rate": {
      +        "anyOf": [
      +          {
      +            "description": "Finite engine decimal string, including exponent notation; retain its precision.",
      +            "pattern": "^[+-]?(?:[0-9]+(?:\\.[0-9]*)?|\\.[0-9]+)(?:[eE][+-]?[0-9]+)?$",
      +            "type": "string"
      +          },
      +          {
      +            "type": "null"
      +          }
      +        ],
      +        "description": "Decimal fraction, e.g. 0.08 means 8%; null if UNKNOWN.",
      +        "title": "Benchmark Rate"
      +      },
      +      "disclaimer": {
      +        "description": "Experimental scope and human-review requirements.",
      +        "title": "Disclaimer",
      +        "type": "string"
      +      },
      +      "engine": {
      +        "description": "Delegated distribution that produced this result.",
      +        "title": "Engine",
      +        "type": "string"
      +      },
      +      "engine_version": {
      +        "description": "Installed version of that engine.",
      +        "title": "Engine Version",
      +        "type": "string"
      +      },
      +      "law_compilation": {
      +        "description": "Compiled law identified by the engine.",
      +        "title": "Law Compilation",
      +        "type": "string"
      +      },
      +      "law_content_date": {
      +        "description": "Date in YYYY-MM-DD form.",
      +        "format": "date",
      +        "pattern": "^[0-9]{4}-(?:0[1-9]|1[0-2])-(?:0[1-9]|[12][0-9]|3[01])$",
      +        "title": "Law Content Date",
      +        "type": "string"
      +      },
      +      "ok": {
      +        "const": true,
      +        "description": "The review ran; this does not mean compliance or a known verdict.",
      +        "title": "Ok",
      +        "type": "boolean"
      +      },
      +      "provenance": {
      +        "additionalProperties": true,
      +        "description": "Unmodified engine source metadata and review provenance.",
      +        "title": "Provenance",
      +        "type": "object"
      +      },
      +      "reason": {
      +        "anyOf": [
      +          {
      +            "type": "string"
      +          },
      +          {
      +            "type": "null"
      +          }
      +        ],
      +        "description": "Engine explanation when the rate is unavailable; otherwise null.",
      +        "title": "Reason"
      +      },
      +      "statutory_trace": {
      +        "description": "Engine statutory citations and audit trace; full only.",
      +        "items": {
      +          "type": "string"
      +        },
      +        "title": "Statutory Trace",
      +        "type": "array"
      +      },
      +      "verdict": {
      +        "description": "Whether the engine has a reviewed rate.",
      +        "enum": [
      +          "KNOWN",
      +          "UNKNOWN"
      +        ],
      +        "title": "Verdict",
      +        "type": "string"
      +      },
      +      "year_of_income": {
      +        "description": "Income or dataset year in YYYY-YY form.",
      +        "pattern": "^[0-9]{4}-[0-9]{2}$",
      +        "title": "Year Of Income",
      +        "type": "string"
      +      }
      +    },
      +    "required": [
      +      "ok",
      +      "engine",
      +      "engine_version",
      +      "law_content_date",
      +      "law_compilation",
      +      "disclaimer",
      +      "year_of_income",
      +      "verdict",
      +      "benchmark_rate",
      +      "reason",
      +      "provenance",
      +      "statutory_trace"
      +    ],
      +    "title": "RateFull",
      +    "type": "object"
      +  },
      +  "RateSummary": {
      +    "additionalProperties": true,
      +    "description": "Concise rate result with source link.",
      +    "properties": {
      +      "benchmark_rate": {
      +        "anyOf": [
      +          {
      +            "description": "Finite engine decimal string, including exponent notation; retain its precision.",
      +            "pattern": "^[+-]?(?:[0-9]+(?:\\.[0-9]*)?|\\.[0-9]+)(?:[eE][+-]?[0-9]+)?$",
      +            "type": "string"
      +          },
      +          {
      +            "type": "null"
      +          }
      +        ],
      +        "description": "Decimal fraction, e.g. 0.08 means 8%; null if UNKNOWN.",
      +        "title": "Benchmark Rate"
      +      },
      +      "disclaimer": {
      +        "description": "Experimental scope and human-review requirements.",
      +        "title": "Disclaimer",
      +        "type": "string"
      +      },
      +      "engine": {
      +        "description": "Delegated distribution that produced this result.",
      +        "title": "Engine",
      +        "type": "string"
      +      },
      +      "engine_version": {
      +        "description": "Installed version of that engine.",
      +        "title": "Engine Version",
      +        "type": "string"
      +      },
      +      "law_compilation": {
      +        "description": "Compiled law identified by the engine.",
      +        "title": "Law Compilation",
      +        "type": "string"
      +      },
      +      "law_content_date": {
      +        "description": "Date in YYYY-MM-DD form.",
      +        "format": "date",
      +        "pattern": "^[0-9]{4}-(?:0[1-9]|1[0-2])-(?:0[1-9]|[12][0-9]|3[01])$",
      +        "title": "Law Content Date",
      +        "type": "string"
      +      },
      +      "ok": {
      +        "const": true,
      +        "description": "The review ran; this does not mean compliance or a known verdict.",
      +        "title": "Ok",
      +        "type": "boolean"
      +      },
      +      "reason": {
      +        "anyOf": [
      +          {
      +            "type": "string"
      +          },
      +          {
      +            "type": "null"
      +          }
      +        ],
      +        "description": "Engine explanation when the rate is unavailable; otherwise null.",
      +        "title": "Reason"
      +      },
      +      "response_detail": {
      +        "const": "summary",
      +        "description": "Summary response marker.",
      +        "title": "Response Detail",
      +        "type": "string"
      +      },
      +      "source": {
      +        "$ref": "#/$defs/VerificationSource",
      +        "description": "Concise verification source."
      +      },
      +      "verdict": {
      +        "description": "Whether the engine has a reviewed rate.",
      +        "enum": [
      +          "KNOWN",
      +          "UNKNOWN"
      +        ],
      +        "title": "Verdict",
      +        "type": "string"
      +      },
      +      "year_of_income": {
      +        "description": "Income or dataset year in YYYY-YY form.",
      +        "pattern": "^[0-9]{4}-[0-9]{2}$",
      +        "title": "Year Of Income",
      +        "type": "string"
      +      }
      +    },
      +    "required": [
      +      "ok",
      +      "engine",
      +      "engine_version",
      +      "law_content_date",
      +      "law_compilation",
      +      "disclaimer",
      +      "year_of_income",
      +      "verdict",
      +      "benchmark_rate",
      +      "reason",
      +      "response_detail",
      +      "source"
      +    ],
      +    "title": "RateSummary",
      +    "type": "object"
      +  },
      +  "VerificationSource": {
      +    "additionalProperties": true,
      +    "properties": {
      +      "verify_at": {
      +        "anyOf": [
      +          {
      +            "type": "string"
      +          },
      +          {
      +            "type": "null"
      +          }
      +        ],
      +        "description": "Engine verification URL; empty or null when none is available.",
      +        "title": "Verify At"
      +      }
      +    },
      +    "required": [
      +      "verify_at"
      +    ],
      +    "title": "VerificationSource",
      +    "type": "object"
      +  }
      +}
    • removedOutput schema / additionalProperties
      Removed value: -true
    • addedOutput schema / anyOf
      Added value: +[
      +  {
      +    "$ref": "#/$defs/RateSummary"
      +  },
      +  {
      +    "$ref": "#/$defs/RateFull"
      +  }
      +]
    • changedOutput schema / title
      Previous value: -"get_div7a_benchmark_rateDictOutput"New value: +"Div7aRate"
  4. Changed2 schema fields changedv0.1.7
    • addedInput schema / properties / response_detail / description
      Added value: +"\"summary\" (default) returns the concise result; \"full\" includes the complete engine audit and provenance."
    • addedInput schema / properties / year_of_income / description
      Added value: +"Income year being reviewed, YYYY-YY, e.g. \"2025-26\". Years outside the engine reviewed rate table return UNKNOWN."
  5. Added

TDQS

A4.7/5.0
Behavior5/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already mark the tool as read-only, idempotent, and non-destructive; the description adds 'fails closed outside its reviewed frozen table', 'does not read the network', the UNKNOWN out-of-range behavior, and the response_detail effect. This goes well beyond what annotations alone convey.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Three compact sentences front-load the core purpose and pack constraints, routing, and caveats without filler. Every sentence earns its place: the first states the result, the second gives format and failure behavior, the third covers response_detail, alternatives, and side effects.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness5/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a read-only lookup with a small, fully documented schema and an output schema, the description plus annotations cover out-of-range behavior, network independence, response_detail semantics, sibling routing, and the non-advice caveat. Nothing an agent needs to call it correctly is missing.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100%; both parameters are fully described, including year format, UNKNOWN behavior, default, and the summary/full distinction. The description mostly restates these facts, adding only 'complete provenance and statutory trace', so the schema carries the load and the description adds marginal value.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description opens with a specific verb ('Return') and a precise resource ('the reviewed s 109N(2) rate for a year'), including the UNKNOWN fallback. It distinguishes this tool from sibling lookup tools by naming review_div7a_loan and explicitly disclaiming live rate lookup.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines5/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

It explicitly routes loan-fact reviews to review_div7a_loan and warns it is 'not advice or a live rate lookup'. This gives clear when-to-use and when-not-to-use guidance, helping the agent avoid the wrong sibling without needing to open their schemas.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.