Skip to main content
Glama
ryancnelson

I'm an Old Sun Box — MCP

by ryancnelson

Server Configuration

Describes the environment variables required to run the server.

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault

No arguments

Instructions

Guidance the server publishes about itself, which clients place ahead of the tool catalog so the model reads it before choosing anything.

This server publishes no instructions, or was last inspected before Glama recorded them.

Capabilities

Features and capabilities supported by this server

Protocol revision2025-11-25

CapabilityDetails
tools
{
  "listChanged": false
}
prompts
{
  "listChanged": false
}
resources
{
  "subscribe": false,
  "listChanged": false
}
experimental
{}

Tools

Functions exposed to the LLM to take actions

NameDescription
lab.list_runsD
lab.describe_runD
lab.classifyD
guest.console_tailD
guest.execD
qemu.statusD
qemu.hmp_queryD
qemu.hmp_controlD
host.process_sampleD
host.trace_capabilitiesD
host.traceD
debugger.captureD
evidence.recordD
evidence.readD
hypothesis.startD
hypothesis.updateD

Prompts

Interactive templates invoked by user choice

NameDescription

No prompts

Resources

Contextual data attached and managed by the client

NameDescription

No resources

TDQS

D1.6/5.0

Scored across 16 tools

Disambiguation2/5

Several tool names overlap in intent: debugger.capture, evidence.record, and host.trace all imply capturing observational data, while qemu.hmp_query and qemu.status both seem to query VM state. Without descriptions, an agent could easily select the wrong tool for a task.

Naming Consistency4/5

Tools consistently use a dotted domain prefix such as host., guest., qemu., lab., and evidence., which creates a clear namespace. The second segment is less uniform (verbs, nouns, and verb_noun forms), so it is not perfectly consistent, but the overall convention is predictable.

Tool Count4/5

16 tools is slightly above the typical well-scoped range but justified by the breadth of a debugging/forensics server spanning host tracing, guest execution, QEMU control, evidence management, and lab workflows. It feels comprehensive rather than bloated.

Completeness2/5

The set covers start/read actions well but lacks lifecycle closures: hypothesis.start has no hypothesis.end or hypothesis.cancel, evidence.record/read has no evidence.delete/list, and there is no clear stop/cleanup for host.trace or debugger.capture. These gaps create dead ends in common workflows.

Maintenance

ActivityMaintained
ResponsivenessNo issues