safe-mcp-suite

A hardened suite of two MCP servers — a terminal command executor and a file organizer — built on one shared, deny-by-default safety core.

What this is

Giving a model raw shell access or unrestricted file-move access is dangerous: one crafted string can chain commands or escape a directory, and a naive file mover can overwrite or lose files with no way back. safe-mcp-suite turns both into bounded, auditable operations — safe-mcp terminal runs a small, explicitly allowlisted set of commands with no shell, and safe-mcp files organizes a workspace with every move undoable and nothing ever silently overwritten. Both are wiring around one shared core (safety/) that answers every allow/deny question the same way: nothing is permitted unless a rule allows it, and every decision is audited before the caller finds out what it was.

Related MCP server: win-cli-mcp-server

Quickstart

Requires Python 3.12+ and uv.

Both servers take their policy file as an explicit --config PATH argument. There's no default policy.toml lookup and nothing reads a .env file — uv run doesn't load one on its own, so a value that lives only there is a value the server never sees. --config (or the SAFE_MCP_POLICY_FILE environment variable, and takes effect when --config is absent) is the one path that's actually guaranteed.

The repo ships two policy files: policy.toml is an annotated template with jail_root and workspace_root commented out — it refuses to start until you set them, on purpose. policy.example.toml is the ready-to-run one, with real values under a ./sandbox directory the commands below create.

git clone https://github.com/Asaad-Suliman/safe-mcp-suite.git safe-mcp-suite
cd safe-mcp-suite
uv sync
./scripts/make_demo_sandbox.sh
uv run safe-mcp terminal --config policy.example.toml
uv run safe-mcp files --config policy.example.toml

jail_root and workspace_root are still required, here or via SAFE_MCP_JAIL_ROOT / SAFE_MCP_WORKSPACE_ROOT — that hasn't changed. audit_log and journal live under state/, outside both jails (a permitted command could otherwise read or forge its own audit trail), which is why the script above creates it alongside the two sandboxes.

Register with an MCP client, for example:

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "safe-mcp terminal": {
      "command": "uv",
      "args": ["run", "safe-mcp", "terminal"],
      "env": {
        "SAFE_MCP_POLICY_FILE": "/srv/safe-mcp/policy.example.toml",
        "SAFE_MCP_JAIL_ROOT": "/srv/safe-mcp/sandbox"
      }
    },
    "safe-mcp files": {
      "command": "uv",
      "args": ["run", "safe-mcp", "files"],
      "env": {
        "SAFE_MCP_POLICY_FILE": "/srv/safe-mcp/policy.example.toml",
        "SAFE_MCP_WORKSPACE_ROOT": "/srv/safe-mcp/inbox"
      }
    }
  }
}

Point SAFE_MCP_POLICY_FILE at whichever policy file you've actually configured for that deployment — policy.example.toml above is illustrative, not a requirement.

An MCP client sets env on the child process directly rather than reading a .env file, so it never had the ambient-state problem the Quickstart did — but SAFE_MCP_POLICY_FILE is now required there too, since startup no longer falls back to a policy.toml in the working directory.

Demo

Real output, captured from both servers running as real subprocesses, driven over the real stdio MCP protocol, against the shipped policy.example.toml and a throwaway workspace. Nothing below is mocked or invented. Run scripts/make_demo_sandbox.sh to build that workspace and the state/ directory it uses for the audit log and undo journal; reproducing the calls below also needs an MCP client of your own to issue them.

Terminal server

An allowed command:

>>> tool: run_command  args: {"command": "cat notes.txt"}
{
  "action": "run_command",
  "code": "OK",
  "detail": {
    "exit_code": 0,
    "stderr": "",
    "stdout": "demo file\n"
  },
  "duration_ms": 1,
  "ok": true,
  "reason": "'cat' is allowed"
}

A denied command:

>>> tool: run_command  args: {"command": "rm -rf /"}
{
  "action": "run_command",
  "code": "POLICY_DENIED",
  "detail": {},
  "duration_ms": 0,
  "ok": false,
  "reason": "'rm' is on the denylist"
}

Files server

The workspace was seeded with report.pdf, photo.png (ordinary files), setup.exe (a restraint skip — installer), .bashrc (a restraint skip — dotfile), and link.pdf, a symlink pointing outside the workspace (a protection skip).

plan_organize proposing moves and listing skips:

>>> tool: plan_organize  args: {}
{
  "action": "plan_organize",
  "code": "OK",
  "detail": {
    "created": "2026-08-07T16:49:00.048899+00:00",
    "move_count": 2,
    "moves": [
      {
        "category": "Images",
        "dest": "Images/photo.png",
        "size": 41,
        "src": "photo.png"
      },
      {
        "category": "Documents",
        "dest": "Documents/report.pdf",
        "size": 16,
        "src": "report.pdf"
      }
    ],
    "plan_id": "7dcf2cff-399d-4af5-bb9a-a4131e1d5288",
    "skip_count": 3,
    "skips": [
      {
        "code": "NEEDS_EXPLICIT_REQUEST",
        "name": ".bashrc",
        "reason": "dotfiles are configuration, not clutter to be filed",
        "rule": "organize"
      },
      {
        "code": "POLICY_DENIED",
        "name": "link.pdf",
        "reason": "'organize' is not permitted by any rule (deny by default)",
        "rule": null
      },
      {
        "code": "NEEDS_EXPLICIT_REQUEST",
        "name": "setup.exe",
        "reason": "installers, executables and application folders are left where the user put them",
        "rule": "organize"
      }
    ],
    "truncated": false
  },
  "duration_ms": 0,
  "ok": true,
  "reason": "proposed 2 move(s), skipped 3"
}

apply_plan executing that same plan:

>>> tool: apply_plan  args: {"plan_id": "7dcf2cff-399d-4af5-bb9a-a4131e1d5288"}
{
  "action": "apply_plan",
  "code": "OK",
  "detail": {
    "moved": 2,
    "moves": [
      {
        "dest": "Images/photo.png",
        "src": "photo.png"
      },
      {
        "dest": "Documents/report.pdf",
        "src": "report.pdf"
      }
    ],
    "plan_id": "7dcf2cff-399d-4af5-bb9a-a4131e1d5288",
    "planned": 2
  },
  "duration_ms": 2,
  "ok": true,
  "reason": "moved 2 file(s)"
}

move_file refused by PROTECTION — the same symlink plan_organize skipped above, named explicitly:

>>> tool: move_file  args: {"src": "link.pdf", "dest": "Documents/link.pdf"}
{
  "action": "move_file",
  "code": "POLICY_DENIED",
  "detail": {},
  "duration_ms": 0,
  "ok": false,
  "reason": "'organize' is not permitted by any rule (deny by default)"
}

move_file succeeding on the installer plan_organize deferred with NEEDS_EXPLICIT_REQUEST, now named explicitly:

>>> tool: move_file  args: {"src": "setup.exe", "dest": "Documents/setup.exe"}
{
  "action": "move_file",
  "code": "OK",
  "detail": {
    "dest": "Documents/setup.exe",
    "moved": 1,
    "src": "setup.exe"
  },
  "duration_ms": 0,
  "ok": true,
  "reason": "moved setup.exe"
}

That contrast is the point of the two-layer model below: the symlink is refused no matter how it's asked for; the installer moves the moment it's asked for by name.

Architecture

Both servers are wiring. Neither re-implements policy, path containment, redaction, or auditing — they call one shared core.

flowchart TB
    client(["MCP client"])

    subgraph terminal["terminal server"]
        tparse["parse.py<br/>argv split + metacharacter scan"]
        texec["execute.py<br/>shell=False, env scrub, timeout, output cap"]
    end

    subgraph files["files server"]
        finspect["inspect.py<br/>lstat facts — reports, never judges"]
        fapply["apply.py<br/>move_one — containment, no overwrite"]
    end

    subgraph core["shared safety core — safety/"]
        policy["policy.py<br/>deny-by-default · PROTECTION / RESTRAINT layers"]
        paths["paths.py<br/>PathJail: resolve / resolve_for_write"]
        redact["redact.py<br/>redact, then truncate"]
        audit[("audit.py<br/>fail-closed JSONL — attempt + outcome")]
    end

    client -->|run_command / explain_command| tparse
    client -->|list_files / plan_organize / apply_plan / move_file / undo / redo| finspect

    tparse --> policy
    finspect --> policy
    policy --> paths
    texec --> paths
    fapply --> paths
    texec --> redact

    terminal -.->|every call, before and after| audit
    files -.->|every call, before and after| audit

safety/ imports nothing outside the standard library. Only the two servers depend on the mcp package.

The two-layer model: PROTECTION vs RESTRAINT

Every file rule in policy.toml declares a layer:

• protection — a safety invariant. Binding on every tool, however the request was phrased. Nothing you can ask for makes it permitted.

• restraint — a rule that exists because filing this automatically would be a guess. It stops plan_organize acting on its own initiative; it does not stop a request that names one specific file.

plan_organize walks the workspace unprompted, so it obeys both layers. move_file carries a request naming one specific file, so it obeys PROTECTION only — a restraint rule is not a safety refusal for a caller that isn't guessing.

The demo above is this distinction end to end, on the same two files:

• link.pdf is a symlink pointing outside the workspace. plan_organize skips it, and move_file refuses it too, by name, with the identical POLICY_DENIED code. There is no phrasing that gets it through.

• setup.exe is an installer. plan_organize skips it with NEEDS_EXPLICIT_REQUEST — not a refusal, a pointer to move_file. Naming it there succeeds.

One nuance worth being explicit about: the symlink's refusal reason reads "'organize' is not permitted by any rule (deny by default)" rather than anything mentioning "symlink". A symlink matches no allow rule in either layer, so it falls through to deny-by-default — and safety.policy.evaluate_layered classifies an unmatched deny-by-default fallthrough as PROTECTION on purpose, as the strictest reading of something the policy has no vocabulary for. The generic wording is not a weaker guarantee; move_file naming the symlink directly, above, is the proof.

Guarantees

Threat model — explicitly out of scope

• A dangerous command you allowlisted. If you allow an interpreter or a shell-like tool (bash, python, sh, find -exec, awk, env, …), the model can do anything that tool can. Policy strength is entirely the operator's allowlist.

• Kernel / sandbox escapes. The jail is a path-containment check, not a kernel sandbox — no namespaces, cgroups, or seccomp. See "Honest caveats".

• Host access to the state files. The audit log and undo journal are tamper-evident to the server, not tamper-proof against anyone with host filesystem access to them.

• Redaction completeness. Pattern-based and best-effort; a secret shape the patterns don't recognise passes through.

• Multi-tenant identity or rate limiting. There is no per-caller authentication inside either server — the trust boundary is "whoever can start this process," which an MCP client enforces by launching it, not this code.

• A race between validating a path and acting on it (TOCTOU). See "Honest caveats" below.

Compared to a naive MCP server

Many quick MCP servers wrap subprocess.run(cmd, shell=True) for terminal access and os.rename for file moves. Both are convenient and unsafe. This table is factual, not a claim of perfect security.

Both tools return an OperationResult:

OperationResult {
  ok: bool
  code: ResultCode
  action: str
  reason: str
  detail: dict            # stdout, stderr, exit_code — empty when nothing ran
  duration_ms: int
}

• run_command(command: str, cwd: str | None = None) — evaluate command against policy and, if allowed, run it sandboxed. cwd is optional and must resolve inside the jail root; a traversal, symlink, or absolute path that escapes returns PATH_ESCAPE without running anything. Every invocation is audited; under fail-closed auditing an unwritable log returns AUDIT_UNAVAILABLE rather than executing unlogged. A non-zero exit code is still ok: true — the command ran; whether it succeeded is its own business.

• explain_command(command: str) — the dry run. Reaches the same parse and evaluation as run_command and returns before the executor, so detail never carries stdout, stderr, or an exit code — nothing ran.

Result codes this server can return: OK, POLICY_DENIED, INVALID_REQUEST, PATH_ESCAPE, TIMEOUT, OUTPUT_TRUNCATED, OPERATION_FAILED, AUDIT_UNAVAILABLE, INTERNAL_ERROR.

Six tools, and the list is the design — there is no seventh, and none of them delete.

• list_files(subdir: str | None = None) — read-only. Reports each entry's name, size, category, whether the organizer would move it, and why not when it wouldn't.

• plan_organize() — proposes moves and skips. Changes nothing, not even destination folders. Returns a plan_id to pass to apply_plan.

• apply_plan(plan_id: str) — carries out a plan. Every file is re-checked first; if any changed, moved, or vanished since planning, the whole plan is refused. Single-use — an id cannot be replayed.

• move_file(src: str, dest: str) — moves one named file. dest is the full destination path, not a folder. A destination that already exists is refused, never overwritten and never renamed around. Obeys PROTECTION rules only — see "The two-layer model" above.

• undo_last_action() — reverses the most recent move or applied plan, as one action. Nothing is overwritten to make room for a restored file.

• redo_last_action() — reapplies the most recently undone action. The redo stack clears whenever new work is recorded.

Result codes this server can additionally return: NEEDS_EXPLICIT_REQUEST (cleared every safety invariant, declined only because acting unprompted would be a guess — name the target directly and ask).

One file, policy.toml, read by both servers:

audit_log = "audit.jsonl"          # shared
audit_fail_mode = "closed"         # shared: "closed" or "open"

[redaction]                        # shared
enabled = true
entropy_fallback = false
extra_patterns = []                # [{ name = "...", regex = "..." }]

[terminal]
# jail_root = "/srv/safe-mcp/sandbox"   # REQUIRED — here or via env

[terminal.limits]
timeout_seconds = 30
max_output_bytes = 65536

[terminal.allowlist]
commands = ["ls", "cat", "echo", "pwd", "git"]

[terminal.denylist]
commands = ["rm", "shutdown", "reboot", "curl", "wget", "chmod", "sudo"]

[[terminal.rules]]
command = "git"
deny_args = ["push --force", "push -f"]
reason = "force-push rewrites shared history"

[files]
# workspace_root = "/srv/safe-mcp/inbox"   # REQUIRED — here or via env
journal = "organizer-journal.json"
max_plan_moves = 500

[files.categories]
Documents = [".pdf", ".doc", ".docx", "..."]
# ...

[[files.skip]]
layer = "protection"   # or "restraint" — required, no default
when = ["unsafe-name"]
reason = "..."

The policy file itself has no default location. Point at it with --config:

safe-mcp terminal --config /path/to/policy.toml
safe-mcp files --config /path/to/policy.toml

Environment variables remain supported and every one overrides the matching policy.toml key. SAFE_MCP_POLICY_FILE is the one exception worth calling out: it's an alternative to --config, not an override of it — --config wins if both are given, and startup refuses if neither is.

Startup fails loudly — a printed fatal: message and a non-zero exit — on no policy file path given at all (neither --config nor SAFE_MCP_POLICY_FILE), a missing or invalid policy.toml, an unset or non-directory jail/workspace root, an invalid operator redaction regex, an unlabeled [[files.skip]] entry, or an audit log / journal located inside a jail it would then be able to move or forge.

Honest caveats

This is a hardening layer, not a vault. Read these before deploying either server.

• The jail is a path-containment check, not a kernel sandbox. No namespaces, cgroups, or seccomp. A kernel exploit or an escape hatch reachable from an allowlisted binary is not contained.

• The audit log is tamper-evident, not tamper-proof, and has no rotation. Append-only with per-record flush + fsync means it won't lose records to a crash, but anyone with host filesystem access to audit.jsonl can read, alter, or delete it — and the file grows without bound; there is no rotation or retention policy built in.

• Redaction is pattern-based and best-effort. It catches common secret shapes; a novel or unusual format passes through unredacted. The optional entropy fallback is off by default because it's noisy on git SHAs, UUIDs, and base64 data, not because it's weak.

• Terminal metacharacters are rejected even inside quotes — a known ceiling. echo "a;b" is refused even though the ; is inert inside the quotes, because the scan is a raw substring check with no awareness of quoting. That is the safe direction to be wrong in — there is no quoting trick that gets an operator past a scan that ignores quoting in the first place — but it does mean some legitimate input is refused.

• TOCTOU: a path validated then acted upon can change in between. Both safety/paths.py and servers/files/apply.py check containment or occupancy and then act on a separate syscall; a symlink swapped or a file created in that gap is not covered. Documented in-code as a deliberate, named ceiling (# NOTE: comments in both files), with an upgrade path (O_NOFOLLOW plus dir-fd relative operations) noted for if it's ever needed.

• Grandchild processes are not reaped. A killed or timed-out command's own child processes are not in a separate process group; the executor kills the direct child only, so anything that command spawned can outlive it.

Related work

• hardened-terminal-mcp — the standalone predecessor to this suite's terminal server.

• MCP-file-organizer — the standalone predecessor to this suite's file server.

License

MIT — see LICENSE.