creo_open_model
Opens a Creo Parametric model file (PRT, ASM, or DRW) by specifying its name or file path.
Instructions
Open a Creo model (PRT, ASM, or DRW)
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| name | Yes | Model name or file path |
Opens a Creo Parametric model file (PRT, ASM, or DRW) by specifying its name or file path.
Open a Creo model (PRT, ASM, or DRW)
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| name | Yes | Model name or file path |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations provided, and the description does not disclose behavioral traits such as side effects (e.g., loading model into application state), error conditions, or whether it can open already-opened models. Minimal transparency.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
One concise sentence front-loaded with verb and resource, zero wasted words. Efficient and to the point.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Adequate for a simple single-parameter tool, but lacks details on return value (success/error), model state after opening, and missing annotations. Could be more complete for an unannotated tool.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Single parameter 'name' has schema description 'Model name or file path' (100% coverage). The tool description adds file type context (PRT, ASM, DRW) but no further semantics like format restrictions or path resolution behavior. Baseline 3 applies.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
Clearly states the verb (Open), resource (Creo model), and specifies supported file types (PRT, ASM, DRW). Distinguishes from sibling 'find_part_and_open_in_creo' which adds a search step.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
Provides no guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives like 'find_part_and_open_in_creo' or 'creo_export_step'. No prerequisites, context, or exclusions mentioned.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/rweisssieker-xp/GBL-CREO-WINDCHILL-MCP'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server