Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to catia-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      MCP server that controls SolidWorks via COM, enabling CAD automation with 138 tools for sketching, 3D features, assemblies, drawings, and more.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      MCP server for controlling a live SOLIDWORKS session through the Windows COM API, enabling native CAD operations like sketches, features, bodies, views, and exports, plus transactional plans and vectorization.
      8
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables building CATIA V5 solids from a written specification by running ordered tool recipes through COM automation, and verifying the result with exact face/edge/vertex counts, volume, area and centre-of-gravity assertions. Also supports sketching, part design, generative shape design, assembly placement, measurement and STEP/STL/IGES export.
      1
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      MCP server for full AutoCAD automation, AutoCAD LT automation, and headless DXF generation. It provides 8 consolidated tools for drawing, entity, layer, block, annotation, P&ID, view, and system operations via MCP stdio transport.
      12
      41
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables MCP clients to connect to and automate AutoCAD on Windows via COM, exposing tools to inspect drawings and layers, create geometry and text, manage system variables, run commands, and save or open drawings. Requires full AutoCAD running with a drawing open.
      1
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Connect Claude AI to Dassault Systemes CATIA V5 via the Model Context Protocol (MCP). Drive CATIA V5 CAD modeling from Claude Desktop or Claude Code using natural language.
      154
      MIT

    TDQS

    B3.1/5.0

    Scored across 161 tools

    Disambiguation2/5

    Several tool pairs have unclear boundaries: catia_new_part vs catia_add_new_part, catia_update vs catia_update_assembly, catia_measure vs catia_measure_distance, catia_sketch_spline vs catia_gsd_spline, and catia_transform_body vs catia_gsd_transform. The descriptions clarify once read, but the volume of overlapping concepts makes misselection likely.

    Naming Consistency3/5

    Most tools follow a snake_case catia_verb_noun pattern, but there are notable deviations like catia_bounding_box, catia_status, catia_capabilities, catia_measure, and catia_zoom. The mixed mix of list_/create_/set_/get_ alongside bare nouns and verbs is readable but not uniform.

    Tool Count1/5

    161 tools is an extreme count for a single MCP server. Even for CATIA's broad domain, this creates a massive surface that is difficult to navigate and maintain; the set would benefit from consolidation or modular splitting.

    Completeness4/5

    The tool surface is remarkably deep, covering part design, sketches, GSD, assemblies, constraints, measurements, drawings, parameters, materials, and export. Minor gaps exist (e.g., drawing dimensions, sketch fillet/chamfer), but core workflows are well supported.

    Maintenance

    ActivitySlowing
    ResponsivenessNo issues