Skip to main content
Glama

jira_version_create

Create a new version in a JIRA project with specified name, project key, optional dates, archived, and released flags.

Instructions

Create a new version in a JIRA project. Dates must be YYYY-MM-DD and are validated client-side. Returns YAML for the created version. Mirrors omni-dev atlassian jira version create.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
nameYesVersion name (e.g., `1.0.0`).
projectYesProject key (e.g., `PROJ`).
archivedNoWhether the version is archived. Defaults to `false`.
releasedNoWhether the version is released. Defaults to `false`.
start_dateNoStart date (ISO 8601, `YYYY-MM-DD`). Validated client-side.
descriptionNoVersion description.
release_dateNoRelease date (ISO 8601, `YYYY-MM-DD`). Validated client-side.
Behavior3/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations provided, so description must cover behavior. It mentions creation, date validation client-side, and YAML output, but lacks permission requirements, error behavior, or side effects.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Two efficient sentences with no wasted words. Front-loaded with core action, then specifics.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness4/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Adequate for a simple create tool, but misses potential prerequisites (e.g., project permissions) and error scenarios. Output format is stated.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters4/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema covers all 7 parameters with descriptions (100% coverage). Description adds value by noting client-side validation and YAML return format, which are not in the schema.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Clearly states 'Create a new version in a JIRA project.' with specific verb and resource. Differentiates from sibling list tool. Includes date format details.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines2/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance on when to use this tool vs alternatives like jira_version_list or other create tools. No prerequisites or exclusions mentioned.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Install Server

Other Tools

Latest Blog Posts

MCP directory API

We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.

curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/rust-works/omni-dev'

If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server