Generate Cookie Policy

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations, the description carries the behavioral disclosure burden. It usefully discloses the external service (privacypage.io), the 25-line preview, the documentId return, and the one-time $9.99 license. However, it does not mention that user-provided data is sent to a third-party service or indicate any side effects or limitations.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Two compact sentences deliver the core function first, then the return value and pricing model. No filler or repetition; every clause adds useful information.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

The description explains the immediate output (preview and documentId) but not how the documentId relates to the sibling get_full_document tool or how the license unlock is exercised. Given there is no output schema, slightly more workflow context would make the tool easier to invoke and hand off correctly.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The input schema already provides 100% parameter description coverage, including examples and common values for cookieTypes and thirdPartyServices. The description adds no parameter-specific meaning, so baseline 3 is appropriate.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description uses a specific verb and resource: 'Generate a GDPR-aware cookie policy for a website or web app using privacypage.io.' It clearly distinguishes this tool from the sibling privacy policy, terms of service, EULA, and disclaimer generators by focusing on cookie policy generation.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description implies the tool is for websites or web apps needing a cookie policy, which gives some context, but it does not explicitly state when to choose this instead of generate_privacy_policy or other siblings. No exclusions or alternative routing are provided.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.