Skip to main content
Glama
rupinder2

mcp-orchestrator

by rupinder2

Related Servers

Alternatives to mcp-orchestrator

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables centralized routing, discovery, namespacing, and execution of tools from multiple remote MCP servers over HTTP/SSE, aggregating them behind a unified MCP gateway with dynamic server management.
      -
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      A gateway that aggregates multiple MCP servers into a single endpoint, namespacing their tools and forwarding calls, so an agent connects to one MCP to access the entire stack.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Acts as an MCP gateway aggregating multiple child MCP servers into a single namespaced interface, with an optional memory layer that caches tool results to reduce redundant calls.
      15 npm
      MIT
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables centralized management and unified interface for multiple child MCP servers (filesystem, sqlite, etc.), allowing users to discover, launch, and execute tools across different MCP servers through a single gateway.
      -
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Aggregates multiple MCP servers behind a single endpoint, letting MCP clients access all their tools through one URL and token while namespacing tools to avoid collisions.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables AI harnesses to connect to a single MCP endpoint that routes to multiple downstream MCP servers, discovering and executing capabilities on demand while keeping tool schemas out of context.
      4
      50 npm
      Apache 2.0

    TDQS

    A3.9/5.0

    Scored across 2 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    The two tools have clearly distinct purposes: one searches/disovers tools across servers, the other invokes a specific remote tool. There is no overlap or ambiguity between them.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    Both names are snake_case and descriptive, but 'tool_search' follows a noun_verb pattern while 'call_remote_tool' follows verb_remote_noun. This is a minor inconsistency; renaming to 'search_tools' would make it perfectly uniform.

    Tool Count3/5

    With only 2 tools, the server feels slightly thin for an orchestrator role. The tool count is borderline below the typical 3-15 range, but the two tools cover core orchestration functions (discovery and invocation).

    Completeness3/5

    The pair covers the main workflow: search for tools and call them. However, missing operations like listing registered servers, checking server health, or managing registrations mean the surface is not fully complete for a comprehensive orchestrator, though workable for basic flows.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessNo issues