Skip to main content
Glama
runtimeguard

ai-runtime-guard

by runtimeguard

Related Servers

Alternatives to ai-runtime-guard

  • A
    license
    C
    quality
    C
    maintenance
    A Model Context Protocol (MCP) server that provides AI-powered security analysis and safety instruction tools. This server helps protect AI agents by providing security guidelines, content analysis, and cautionary instructions when interacting with various MCPs and external services.
    6
    20 npm
    22
    ISC

Related Servers

  • A
    license
    Not graded
    quality
    C
    maintenance
    An MCP server that enforces runtime governance on AI agent actions — file access, command execution, delegation chains, and permission escalation.
    MIT
  • A
    license
    Not graded
    quality
    C
    maintenance
    An open-source MCP server that protects AI agents at runtime by evaluating every tool call against YAML policies and generating audit trails.
    1
    Apache 2.0
  • A
    license
    Not graded
    quality
    A
    maintenance
    MCP server that intercepts and controls AI agent actions in your codebase by enforcing policies on file operations and commands, with logging, approval workflows, and rollback capabilities.
    MIT
  • A
    license
    B
    quality
    C
    maintenance
    An MCP server that enforces runtime authorization for tool calls using Stage0 policy validation, preventing AI agents from executing unauthorized actions before they happen.
    6
    MIT
  • A
    license
    Not graded
    quality
    D
    maintenance
    MCP server that provides runtime defense for AI agents, protecting against prompt injection, data exfiltration, and other adversarial attacks through a ranked pipeline of up to 36 inline defenses and 3 output scanners.
    3
    Apache 2.0

TDQS

B3.4/5.0

Scored across 8 tools

Disambiguation5/5

Each tool targets a distinct operation: file read/write/edit/delete, command execution, directory listing, backup restore, and server info. No two tools have overlapping purposes.

Naming Consistency5/5

All tool names follow a consistent snake_case verb_noun pattern (e.g., delete_file, execute_command, server_info). No mixing of conventions.

Tool Count5/5

8 tools is well-scoped for a runtime guard. Each tool earns its place by covering essential file, command, backup, and info operations without bloat.

Completeness4/5

Covers core CRUD-like operations for files, plus command execution and backup. Minor gaps like missing move/copy or directory creation tools, but agents can work around with existing tools.

Maintenance

ActivityInactive
ResponsivenessUnresponsive