delete-container-registry-auth

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already include destructiveHint=true. The description adds explicit context about permanence ('This cannot be undone'), which is valuable beyond annotations. No contradiction. Slight deduction for not mentioning any other side effects or permissions.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Two sentences, no wasted words. Action verb first, then consequence. Perfectly front-loaded and concise.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a simple one-parameter delete tool with annotations and no output schema, the description is nearly complete. It provides purpose and irreversibility. Missing only explicit usage guidelines, but overall sufficient.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Input schema covers the sole parameter (containerRegistryAuthId) with a description. The tool description does not elaborate on parameter meaning beyond what schema provides. Schema coverage is 100%, so baseline of 3 is appropriate.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the action 'permanently delete a saved container-registry credential', with a specific verb (delete) and resource (container-registry auth). It distinguishes from siblings like create, get, list, which have different purposes.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description implies usage when deletion is intended, but does not explicitly state when to avoid this tool or mention alternatives. Given only one delete variant for this resource, no alternative is needed, but clearer context on prerequisites or consequences beyond 'cannot be undone' would improve guidance.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.