Skip to main content
Glama

nodes

Inspect a saved Figma layer or exact instance sublayer offline to retrieve expanded fills, text, and auto-layout data without Figma login or API limits.

Instructions

A node or exact instance sublayer as Figma REST nodes.json: instances expanded, fills, text, auto-layout. Can be large.

Input Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
fileYesthe saved .fig: a local path (absolute recommended), or gs://bucket/object using gcloud; remote sources are unavailable with --root
nodeYesa stored node id (12:345 or 12-345), full instance sublayer id (I12:345;67:89) from inspect/nodes, or a Figma URL with ?node-id=

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. Changed4 schema fields changedv0.7.2
    • addedInput schema / additionalProperties
      Added value: +true
    • changedInput schema / properties / file / description
      Previous value: -"the .fig file (File > Save local copy): an absolute path, or gs://bucket/object"New value: +"the saved .fig: a local path (absolute recommended), or gs://bucket/object using gcloud; remote sources are unavailable with --root"
    • addedInput schema / properties / file / minLength
      Added value: +1
    • changedInput schema / properties / node / description
      Previous value: -"a node id (12:345 or 12-345) or a Figma URL with ?node-id="New value: +"a stored node id (12:345 or 12-345), full instance sublayer id (I12:345;67:89) from inspect/nodes, or a Figma URL with ?node-id="
  2. First observed

TDQS

C2.9/5.0
Behavior3/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description carries the behavioral burden. It usefully discloses that instances are expanded, that fills/text/auto-layout are included, and that output can be large, but it does not state read-only behavior, permissions, or error characteristics.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness4/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is short and front-loads the resource plus key output details, with no filler. The sentence-fragment style slightly weakens clarity but keeps it efficient.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness3/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

The description covers the return shape and a useful size warning, and the input schema covers both parameters well. However, it omits sibling selection guidance and does not clarify read-only/safety behavior, leaving meaningful context gaps for an agent choosing between node-related tools.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100%, so the schema already fully documents the file and node parameters. The description adds no parameter-level detail beyond what the schema provides; 'exact instance sublayer' is already covered by the node parameter description.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose3/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description identifies the resource and output as 'A node or exact instance sublayer as Figma REST nodes.json' and lists included content, but it uses a noun phrase with no action verb. It also does not distinguish this tool from siblings such as inspect, tree, or find.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines2/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

There is no guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives, and no exclusions or prerequisites are stated. The only usage-adjacent note is 'Can be large,' which is not selection guidance.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Deploy Server

Other Tools