Update website chat button

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

The annotations provide idempotentHint and openWorldHint, but the description adds no behavioral context beyond what the annotations already tell us. It does not explain what the update does, whether it is a partial or full update, or what side effects may occur. The description merely restates the tool's name.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single short sentence with no wasted words, but it is under-specified to the point of being a tautology. It adds no information beyond the tool title and does not help the agent understand usage.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

With no output schema and low-parameter schema descriptions, the description should explain what the tool returns and what the body should contain. It does neither. The tool is a simple update but relies on a complex, undocumented body object, making the description highly incomplete.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The schema has 0% description coverage and the description does not explain the 'id' or 'body' parameters. For 'body', there is no indication of expected fields or structure, which is critical because the schema allows arbitrary properties. The description completely fails to compensate for the lack of schema descriptions.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description uses a clear verb ('Update') and resource ('CRM plugin / website chat button'). It distinguishes the tool from siblings like list/get/create, though the slash creates slight ambiguity about whether plugins and chat buttons are the same resource. It does not differentiate from 'connect_chat', but the overall purpose is clear.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description provides no guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives. It does not mention prerequisites, nor does it explain when to use this update tool versus the 'update_one' variants seen across other resource types. No exclusions or alternatives are noted.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.