suno-mcp
Related Servers
Alternatives to suno-mcp
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- FlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceMCP server for Suno music generation API that enables generating lyrics and custom songs with style tags, model selection, and automatic polling for task completion.2-
- FlicenseAqualityCmaintenanceMCP server that enables generating songs or instrumental music using Suno V6, V6_MINI, and V6_WILD models via the Kie.ai API, with support for checking task status and retrieving audio URLs.2-
- AlicenseAqualityBmaintenanceAn MCP server that generates music using your Suno account, enabling credit checking, song generation, and MP3 downloads without third-party APIs.731 PyPIMIT
- AlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceGenerate music with Suno (v5.5) from any MCP client — async, and billed only on successful renders (a failed render auto-refunds). Hosted Streamable-HTTP server; tools generate_song / wait_for_song / check_song.39 npmMIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityAmaintenanceA FastMCP server that provides full programmatic access to Suno Premier features, including music generation, clip extension, stem separation, and audio retrieval using your Suno account.3MIT
- AlicenseAqualityAmaintenanceMCP server for the Gemini Omni model line, enabling task creation (audio, character, text-to-video) and pricing checks through RunAPI.6289 npmApache 2.0
TDQS
Scored across 21 tools
Each tool targets a distinct Suno operation (e.g., text_to_music vs convert_audio vs cover_audio), but the extremely terse descriptions provide little context to differentiate similar-sounding actions like generate_lyrics vs blend_lyrics or text_to_music vs inspire_music. The names themselves are mostly clear, but an agent may still need to infer nuances.
Nearly all tools follow a snake_case verb_noun pattern (convert_audio, generate_lyrics, get_task). Exceptions like login and text_to_music/text_to_sound introduce minor deviations, but overall the naming is predictable and readable.
21 tools is on the higher side, but each corresponds to a distinct Suno API operation, so the count is justified for comprehensive coverage. The set includes auxiliary tools (login, get_task, check_pricing) that round out the workflow without excessive bloat.
The surface covers a wide range of music generation and manipulation tasks, plus task status retrieval and pricing lookup. Minor gaps exist (e.g., no cancel_task or list_tasks), but core create-and-check workflows are fully supported.