A
licenseA
qualityA
maintenanceEnables creating text-to-video tasks using Seedance models, polling task status, and checking pricing via a single RunAPI API key.
4
49 npm
Apache 2.0
seedream-mcp
by runapi-ai
Related Servers
Alternatives to seedream-mcp
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseAqualityAmaintenanceEnables creating and managing Runway video generation tasks (text-to-video, video extension) through a single RunAPI key, including task polling and pricing checks.538 npmApache 2.0
- AlicenseBqualityAmaintenanceEnables AI image and video generation tasks (text-to-image, image-to-video, edit, upscale, etc.) via RunAPI, with support for polling and pricing lookups.10239 npmApache 2.0
- AlicenseBqualityAmaintenanceEnables creating and managing GPT Image tasks (edit and text-to-image) via RunAPI, with options to poll status and check pricing.594 npmApache 2.0
- AlicenseBqualityAmaintenanceEnables users to create image editing and text-to-image tasks, poll their status, and check pricing for the Nano Banana model line through a RunAPI API key.5218 npmApache 2.0
- FlicenseAqualityBmaintenanceEnables text-to-image generation via RunningHub's seedream-v5-lite model, with support for submitting tasks and polling for results.3-
TDQS
B3.3/5.0
Scored across 6 tools
Disambiguation4/5
The creation tools (text_to_image, edit_image, decompose_layers) are distinct in purpose, though all share similar descriptions. get_task, login, and check_pricing are clearly separate, but the three creation tools could be confused if the descriptions were less clear about their specific operations.
Naming Consistency4/5
Tool names use a consistent snake_case verb_noun pattern (e.g., 'get_task', 'edit_image', 'check_pricing'). The only minor deviation is 'login' (a single verb) and 'decompose_layers' (verb with object but not a standard CRUD noun). Overall, the pattern is predictable.
Tool Count4/5
With 6 tools, the count is well within the ideal range for a focused server. Each tool covers authentication, task creation, status checking, and pricing, which is reasonable for the scope. No redundancy or bloat is apparent.
Completeness3/5
The server covers the core lifecycle of creating tasks, checking results, and authenticating, but it lacks a cancellation or listing operation. Users cannot list all tasks or cancel a task, which could be a gap for an agent managing multiple tasks. However, for simple workflows, the core is sufficient.
Maintenance
ActivityMaintained
ResponsivenessNo issues