agent-guardrail
Related Servers
Alternatives to agent-guardrail
- AlicenseAqualityBmaintenanceA self-hosted decision engine that sits between an AI agent and blockchain execution. Agents submit a proposed action, Guardian returns an explainable ALLOW / WARN / BLOCK before anything gets signed or broadcast.225 PyPI1MIT
Related Servers
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceMCP Server for AI agent identity and authorization. Create, verify, and manage agent identities with trust scores and scoped authorization tokens.MIT
- AlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceMCP server for AI agent identity — verify agents with Ed25519 signatures, check trust scores, sign and verify content, exchange encrypted messages. Built on the Agent Identity Protocol (AIP).8MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceMCP server for AI agent security guardrails. Provides input validation, prompt injection detection, PII redaction, output filtering, policy enforcement, rate limiting, and comprehensive audit logging.42 npm1MIT
- AlicenseAqualityAmaintenanceAn MCP server that exposes governance, trust-scoring, compliance, guardrail, cost, drift, and supply-chain scanning tools and resources to any MCP client over stdio, Streamable HTTP, or legacy HTTP+SSE. It lets agents route every tool call through a deterministic five-way decision (allow, redact, require approval, deny, or quarantine) with hash-chained evidence, human approval workflows, and in-agent trust gates for LangChain, LangGraph, and Google ADK.3044 PyPI1MIT
- AlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceMCP server for enterprise authentication and authorization — JWT validation, OIDC token inspection, OAuth 2.0 introspection, and role-based access control for AI agents.8MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceAn MCP server that enforces runtime governance on AI agent actions — file access, command execution, delegation chains, and permission escalation.MIT
TDQS
Scored across 3 tools
Each tool covers a distinct phase of the guardrail lifecycle: pre-action evaluation, post-action outcome recording, and historical audit retrieval. There is no functional overlap between check, record_outcome, and agent_history, making tool selection unambiguous.
All tools share a consistent 'guardrail_' prefix, with two using a verb_noun pattern (guardrail_check, guardrail_record_outcome). The third, guardrail_agent_history, uses a noun phrase instead of a verb, which is a minor deviation but still predictable and readable.
Three tools is well-scoped for a guardrail server, providing the core operations of checking, recording, and viewing history without unnecessary bloat. This is within the ideal range and earns its place.
The tool set covers the entire guardrail workflow: evaluate before action, record the outcome afterward, and retrieve an audit trail. There are no obvious dead ends or missing critical operations for this focused domain.