Skip to main content
Glama
rudimentall1

agent-guardrail

Related Servers

Alternatives to agent-guardrail

Related Servers

  • A
    license
    A
    quality
    D
    maintenance
    MCP server for AI agent identity — verify agents with Ed25519 signatures, check trust scores, sign and verify content, exchange encrypted messages. Built on the Agent Identity Protocol (AIP).
    8
    MIT
  • A
    license
    Not graded
    quality
    B
    maintenance
    MCP server for AI agent security guardrails. Provides input validation, prompt injection detection, PII redaction, output filtering, policy enforcement, rate limiting, and comprehensive audit logging.
    42 npm
    1
    MIT
  • A
    license
    A
    quality
    A
    maintenance
    An MCP server that exposes governance, trust-scoring, compliance, guardrail, cost, drift, and supply-chain scanning tools and resources to any MCP client over stdio, Streamable HTTP, or legacy HTTP+SSE. It lets agents route every tool call through a deterministic five-way decision (allow, redact, require approval, deny, or quarantine) with hash-chained evidence, human approval workflows, and in-agent trust gates for LangChain, LangGraph, and Google ADK.
    30
    44 PyPI
    1
    MIT
  • A
    license
    A
    quality
    D
    maintenance
    MCP server for enterprise authentication and authorization — JWT validation, OIDC token inspection, OAuth 2.0 introspection, and role-based access control for AI agents.
    8
    MIT
  • A
    license
    Not graded
    quality
    C
    maintenance
    An MCP server that enforces runtime governance on AI agent actions — file access, command execution, delegation chains, and permission escalation.
    MIT

TDQS

A3.9/5.0

Scored across 3 tools

Disambiguation5/5

Each tool covers a distinct phase of the guardrail lifecycle: pre-action evaluation, post-action outcome recording, and historical audit retrieval. There is no functional overlap between check, record_outcome, and agent_history, making tool selection unambiguous.

Naming Consistency4/5

All tools share a consistent 'guardrail_' prefix, with two using a verb_noun pattern (guardrail_check, guardrail_record_outcome). The third, guardrail_agent_history, uses a noun phrase instead of a verb, which is a minor deviation but still predictable and readable.

Tool Count5/5

Three tools is well-scoped for a guardrail server, providing the core operations of checking, recording, and viewing history without unnecessary bloat. This is within the ideal range and earns its place.

Completeness5/5

The tool set covers the entire guardrail workflow: evaluate before action, record the outcome afterward, and retrieve an audit trail. There are no obvious dead ends or missing critical operations for this focused domain.

Maintenance

ActivityMaintained
ResponsivenessNo issues