Yandex Tracker MCP
Related Servers
Alternatives to Yandex Tracker MCP
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseAqualityBmaintenanceEnables AI assistants to securely interact with Yandex Tracker, managing issues, queues, comments, worklogs, and search, including attaching files to issues.561Apache 2.0
- AlicenseCqualityBmaintenanceEnables AI assistants to work with Yandex Tracker through its API, letting them search, create, edit, close, and bulk-manage issues, comments, checklists, time entries, attachments, queues, boards, dashboards, projects, and automation workflows. It also supports read-only mode for safe viewing integrations.18753 npm1MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceEnables AI assistants to interact with Yandex.Tracker task management system through MCP protocol. Supports creating and managing issues, searching tasks, handling comments, managing projects and queues, and generating analytics reports.ISC
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceEnables interaction with Yandex Tracker through its API for managing tasks, comments, and attachments. It supports issue searching, status transitions, and metadata retrieval for automated project management.MIT
- FlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceExposes Yandex Tracker's REST API v3 as tools for LLM clients, enabling issue management and queue operations via natural language.21-
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityNot gradedmaintenanceEnables AI assistants to interact with JetBrains YouTrack 2025.2 for managing issues, sprints, dependencies, time tracking, and knowledge base content. Supports CRUD operations, bulk commands, analytics with Gantt charts and critical path analysis, and covers ~80% of the YouTrack REST API.8 npm52-
TDQS
Scored across 30 tools
Most tools target distinct resource+action pairs (issues, comments, checklist, worklogs, transitions, users). Minor overlap exists among get_user/search_users/list_users and between get_issue_time_report/get_time_report, but descriptions clarify the single-vs-search vs single-issue-vs-summary boundaries well.
Every tool follows a consistent snake_case verb_noun pattern (get_issue, create_issue, add_comment, delete_worklog, list_transitions). Verb choice (get/list/search/add/update/delete/execute) is used semantically and predictably throughout.
With 30 tools this is heavier than the ideal 3-15 range, though the domain (issues, comments, checklist, worklogs, queues, fields, statuses, reports, transitions) is genuinely broad and most tools are distinct. Count sits borderline-heavy rather than clearly bloated.
Coverage is strong: issues (create/update/get/search), worklogs and checklist items (full CRUD), comments (list/add), plus metadata and reporting. Minor gaps remain—no comment update/delete and no issue delete—but core lifecycle workflows are covered.