Skip to main content
Glama
rubenyh

Supabase Read-Only MCP Server

by rubenyh

Related Servers

Alternatives to Supabase Read-Only MCP Server

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Provides a read-only PostgreSQL MCP server with schema introspection. Enforces least-privilege database roles to prevent any writes, even from malicious SQL.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      An MCP server for safe read-only PostgreSQL exploration and querying, enforced by three independent layers: startup privilege audit, lexical guard, and read-only transactions. Offers tools for querying, table listing, schema description, relationship mapping, and query explanation.
      18 npm
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      A safe, read-only MCP server for local development databases (PostgreSQL and SQLite) that provides guarded introspection tools like schema listing, sample rows, and explain plans with column masking and query budgets.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      A self-hostable PostgreSQL MCP server for exploring database schemas and running guarded read/write queries with selectable access modes (readonly, readwrite, admin), plus a dry-run confirm workflow for safety.
      14
      1
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Local MCP server for safe querying and inspecting PostgreSQL databases, with write and maintenance operations disabled by default.
      8
      17 npm
      1
      ISC

    TDQS

    A3.7/5.0

    Scored across 4 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool has a clearly distinct purpose: health_check for server/database status, list_allowed_tables for table enumeration, describe_table for schema metadata, and select_rows for data retrieval. There is no overlap or confusion between these roles.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    All tools use snake_case, which is consistent. However, health_check breaks the verb_noun pattern followed by list_allowed_tables, describe_table, and select_rows, creating a minor deviation.

    Tool Count5/5

    Four tools are well-scoped for a focused read-only server. Each tool earns its place, covering health, table listing, schema description, and row selection without redundancy.

    Completeness4/5

    The surface covers health checks, table discovery, schema metadata, and data selection, which is nearly complete for read-only access. Minor gaps like explicit schema listing or relationship introspection exist but are not critical.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues