A
licenseB
qualityC
maintenanceA local MCP server that gives AI agents structured task planning, execution tracking, and guided research workflows.
16
9 npm
MIT
Research Toolkit
by rrrrrredy
Related Servers
Alternatives to Research Toolkit
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseAqualityBmaintenanceAn MCP server that transforms books into agent-callable skill packages, enabling AI agents to use books as guides for evidence, procedures, and tutoring.201MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceA self-extending MCP server that enables AI agents to browse the web, execute shell and Node snippets, automate browser workflows, access files and git, communicate with other agents, and use dozens of domain-specific calculation and research tools.MIT
- AlicenseBqualityDmaintenanceA standalone MCP server that enables research (web search, URL fetch, news), workspace management (file operations, command execution), and self-extension via markdown-based skills.21MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceA research MCP server that enables AI agents to query the internet using multiple sources like SearXNG, GitHub, Reddit, and YouTube, and returns synthesized answers with citations.MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceAn MCP server that lets AI agents search, view, install, and validate skills from the skillhub registry through tool calls.MIT
TDQS
A3.6/5.0
Scored across 9 tools
Disambiguation3/5
Most tools map to distinct lifecycle stages such as start, status, save, review, and finish, but research_status also reads methods, prepares work, and opens reading views, overlapping research_guide and parts of research_save. The research_check_* tools are distinguishable, while the review-versus-finish boundary requires careful reading of very long descriptions.
Naming Consistency4/5
All tools share the same research_ prefix, making the set predictable. The suffixes mix verbs and nouns, e.g. research_check_updates and research_check_draft versus research_status and research_guide, but this is readable and not confusing enough to break consistency.
Tool Count5/5
Nine tools is well within the appropriate range for a multi-stage research workflow. Each tool corresponds to a recognizable lifecycle operation or mechanical check rather than an arbitrary extra.
Completeness4/5
The surface covers task creation, guidance/status, record saving, update checks, draft checks, reviewer configuration, independent review, and final delivery. Only minor lifecycle gaps exist, such as explicit task listing or deletion/archiving operations.
Maintenance
ActivityActive
ResponsivenessResponsive