GitHub MCP Server
Related Servers
Alternatives to GitHub MCP Server
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- FlicenseBqualityDmaintenanceAn MCP server that allows Claude and other MCP-compatible LLMs to interact with the GitHub API, supporting features like creating issues, getting repository information, listing issues, and searching repositories.4-
- FlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceMCP server exposing GitHub tools for issues, pull requests, and code browsing via the GitHub REST API. Designed for local LLM clients with flat arguments and streamable HTTP support.15-
- AlicenseBqualityCmaintenanceMCP server that exposes GitHub operations as tools for AI agents, enabling code search, issue management, and PR review.12MIT
- FlicenseBqualityDmaintenanceAn MCP server that enables Claude and other compatible LLMs to interact with the GitHub API, supporting features like creating issues, retrieving repository information, listing issues, and searching repositories.4-
- AlicenseBqualityDmaintenanceMCP (Model Context Protocol) server for GitHub API integration. This server provides comprehensive tools for interacting with GitHub repositories, issues, pull requests, branches, and code search through a unified interface.1512 npmMIT
- AlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceGitHub MCP server for Claude Code, Cursor, Cline, Windsurf, and any MCP-compatible client. Exposes GitHub tools (issues, pull requests, code search, file content) to your LLM via the Model Context Protocol.7MIT
TDQS
Scored across 15 tools
Each tool targets a distinct resource or operation: issues (create, get, list, close, batch update, batch add labels), milestones (create, list), PRs (create, get, update, merge), and CI (check status, get logs). No two tools have overlapping purposes.
All tool names follow a consistent verb_noun pattern in snake_case (e.g., close_issue, create_milestone, get_ci_logs). Batch operations are prefixed with 'batch_', and names are descriptive without mixing conventions.
15 tools is a well-scoped set for a GitHub MCP server. It covers core workflows without being overly numerous or too sparse, providing a balanced surface for common development tasks.
The tool set covers CRUD-like operations for issues, PRs, milestones, and CI monitoring. Minor gaps exist (e.g., no tool for adding comments to issues, managing individual labels, or PR review actions), but the core workflows are well-supported, and agents can work around the gaps.