Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to mkt

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables MCP clients to read campaign and account data freely while routing every write through human-approved plans, with budget caps, drift refusal, undo, and audit logging.
      6
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables MCP clients to manage Google Ads accounts through guarded tools for GAQL reporting, keywords, ads, budgets, callouts, and sitelinks, with dry runs and paused-by-default creates.
      Apache 2.0
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables agents to list fleet packages, generate merged MCP configs, run production checklists and doctor reports, inspect catalog health, and execute release ship gates. It provides a single MCP interface for connecting and validating the production toolchain.
      101 npm
      MIT
    • F
      license
      C
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables stdio-capable MCP clients to run governed enterprise operations tasks, including policy/runbook retrieval and ticket and user lookups or writes. High-risk actions are held for human approval and role-based access is enforced server-side, so clients cannot bypass governance.
      4
      1
      -
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables local MCP access to attach to isolated backend environments, monitor runtime health/logs, check security posture, manage snapshots and diffs, audit events, and view sanitized remote inventory.
      11 npm
      Apache 2.0

    TDQS

    C2.9/5.0

    Scored across 43 tools

    Disambiguation3/5

    Descriptions are unusually explicit about each tool's scope and negative space ("只读…不自动…"), which genuinely helps. However there is a dense cluster of near-synonymous planning/analysis views — mkt_goals vs mkt_goal_plan vs mkt_strategy vs mkt_channel_plan vs mkt_sprint_plan vs mkt_cadence vs mkt_gtm_design — and another of reporting views — mkt_status vs mkt_ledger_query vs mkt_scorecard vs mkt_result vs mkt_progress vs mkt_campaign — where an agent could easily pick the wrong one. mkt_memory vs mkt_experience vs mkt_playbooks is also hard to separate at selection time.

    Naming Consistency3/5

    All names share the mkt_ prefix and snake_case, so surface consistency is fine. But the stem mixes nouns (mkt_goals, mkt_strategy, mkt_deals, mkt_voice, mkt_inbox, mkt_journey) with verbs (mkt_search, mkt_optimize, mkt_revise, mkt_audit, mkt_orchestrate), so you cannot infer from the name whether a tool lists, computes, or mutates.

    Tool Count2/5

    43 tools is well past the heavy threshold for what is largely one marketing-ops workflow. Many planning/analysis views are narrow read-only lenses that could be consolidated into fewer parameterized tools.

    Completeness4/5

    The surface covers the full lifecycle: channel/capability registries, goal and plan design, lint/validation, gated execution (mkt_action, mkt_run_queue), measurement, retro, and learning/experience. The write side is intentionally thin (approval and first-run calibration live only in the human CLI), which is a defensible design but leaves no MCP path to author or approve plans.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo recent community issues