resume_print

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations are absent, and the description does not disclose behavioral traits such as whether the print must be paused, what happens if it's already printing, or any side effects. The single sentence offers minimal transparency.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single concise sentence with no wasted words. It front-loads the action and resource, but could be slightly more informative without losing brevity.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given no output schema and no annotations, the description is incomplete. It does not explain expected return values (e.g., success message, new status) nor provide context for differentiating among many sibling print tools.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100%, so the parameters are fully documented in the schema. The description adds no extra meaning beyond what the schema provides, resulting in a baseline score.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description uses a specific verb ('Resume'), clearly identifies the resource ('paused print job'), and specifies the brand/context ('Bambu Lab printer'). It distinguishes well from sibling tools like 'pause_print', 'cancel_print', and 'start_print_job'.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No explicit guidance on when to use or not use this tool. It does not mention that the print must be paused beforehand, nor does it contrast with alternatives like 'cancel_print' or 'start_print_job'. The usage is only implied from the verb.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.