search_bookmarks

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations provided. The description discloses behavioral traits: prioritizes recent bookmarks and automatically expands search if needed. This adds value beyond a simple search description.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Compact two-sentence description plus a note. First sentence states purpose, then args, then behavioral note. Every sentence is essential, no wasted words.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

With only 2 simple params, no output schema, and no annotations, the description fully covers purpose, input semantics, behavioral nuance (recent focus, expansion), and usage alternatives. No gaps.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Input schema has only titles/types with 0% description coverage. The description adds full meaning: query matches against titles, notes, tags; limit is max results (1-100, default 20), fully compensating for the schema's lack of descriptions.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Clearly states it searches bookmarks by query across titles, notes, and tags, and explicitly differentiates from sibling search_bookmarks_extended via 'recent focus' and 'comprehensive historical search'.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Explicitly says 'Searches recent bookmarks first' and provides alternative 'For comprehensive historical search, use search_bookmarks_extended', giving clear when-to-use and when-not-to-use guidance.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.