Skip to main content
Glama
rosskukulinski

omnifocus-sync-mcp

by rosskukulinski
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
TypeScript
Remote

Related Servers

Alternatives to omnifocus-sync-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • OmniFocus MCP Server

      IllyaStarikov
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      F
      maintenance
      An MCP server that provides full read/write access to OmniFocus, enabling AI assistants to manage tasks, projects, folders, tags, and perspectives via 51 tools, resources, and prompts.
      51
      11 npm
      21
      MIT

    • MCP OmniFocus

      someposer
      A
      license
      B
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A Model Context Protocol server that enables automation and management of OmniFocus tasks, projects, and tags using natural language and programmable interfaces from VS Code, command line, or any MCP-compatible client.
      12
      MIT

    • OmniFocus MCP Server

      estrenuo
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      An MCP server that enables AI assistants to interact with OmniFocus on macOS via JXA, supporting task, project, folder, tag, perspective, and search operations.
      31
      11 npm
      MIT
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    A3.9/5.0

    Scored across 8 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool targets a distinct operation: sync, list/get tasks, list projects, and task CRUD (add, complete, edit, delete). No two tools overlap in purpose, making selection unambiguous.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    Most tools follow the verb_noun pattern (list_tasks, get_task, add_task, etc.) with a consistent 'of_' prefix. 'of_sync' is a minor deviation, being a single verb without an explicit object, but the pattern is otherwise uniform.

    Tool Count5/5

    8 tools is well within the ideal range for a focused sync server, covering core task and project operations without over-fragmentation. Each tool earns its place.

    Completeness4/5

    The tool surface covers the main task lifecycle (create, read, update, complete, delete) and project listing, which is adequate for most workflows. Minor gaps include no project creation/editing or dedicated tag listing, but these are not critical dead ends.

    Maintenance

    ActivityStale
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources