Skip to main content
Glama
Sign In
flstudio-mcp

flstudio-mcp

by rosasynthesiz
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
Python
Local

New named pattern (selects it)

fl_arrange_new_pattern

Creates a new empty pattern, assigns a name, and selects it for subsequent note writing.

Instructions

Create + select + name the next empty pattern. After this, the note bridge (fl_write_piano_roll_notes) writes INTO this pattern.

Tool call template

Replace each placeholder with a value matching the input schema. Only required parameters are included; add optional parameters as needed.

{
  "id": 1,
  "jsonrpc": "2.0",
  "method": "tools/call",
  "params": {
    "arguments": {
      "name": "<name>"
    },
    "name": "fl_arrange_new_pattern"
  }
}

Input Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
nameYesPattern name, e.g. 'INTRO'.

Output Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault

No arguments

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. First observedv1.0.0

TDQS

A4.3/5.0
Behavior4/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations indicate non-destructive and non-read-only. The description adds behavioral context: after creation, note writing targets this pattern. No contradictions.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Two sentences, front-loaded, no redundant information. Each sentence serves a purpose.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness5/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the tool's simplicity (one parameter), existing annotations, and output schema, the description sufficiently explains the tool's effect and usage context.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The schema covers the sole parameter 'name' with high coverage. The description does not add additional semantics beyond the schema's example.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool creates, selects, and names a new empty pattern. It also explains the subsequent effect on note writing. This distinguishes it from sibling tools like fl_arrange_clone_pattern.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines4/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description implicitly tells when to use: to create a new pattern for writing notes. It does not explicitly state when not to use or mention alternatives, but the context is clear.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Deploy Server

Other Tools