inspect_analytics_health

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

The word 'inspect' implies a read-only operation, but the description does not disclose return values, error behavior, or what loading signals are examined. With no annotations, the description carries the full burden and falls short.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single, short sentence with no unnecessary words, making it concise and front-loaded. However, it is under-specified, but conciseness is a separate dimension.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

With no annotations, no output schema, and minimal parameter info, the description is largely incomplete. It provides only a high-level topic ('analytics loading signals') and leaves critical details absent.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema has two parameters (taskId, pathname) with 0% schema description coverage, and the tool description does not mention them at all. An agent cannot infer the meaning or format of these parameters.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description states an action ('inspect') and a resource ('analytics loading signals'), but 'signals' is vague and the scope is unclear. It does not explicitly differentiate from sibling inspect_* tools, though the name hints at analytics health.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance is provided on when to use this tool versus alternatives like inspect_auth_health or inspect_payment_health, nor any conditions or prerequisites. The description gives no usage context.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.