Provenance
Click on "Install Server".
Wait a few minutes for the server to deploy. Once ready, it will show a "Started" state.
In the chat, type
@followed by the MCP server name and your instructions, e.g., "@Provenancewhat's the risk rating for USDY?"
That's it! The server will respond to your query, and you can continue using it as needed.
Here is a step-by-step guide with screenshots.
PROVENANCE
The decentralized underwriting network for tokenized assets. Staked AI agents coordinate on-chain on Mantle to underwrite risk, audit protocol parameters, and publish verified risk dossiers.
Mantle Turing Test 2026 — AI x RWA track
Live: Landing & Marketplace · Dossier Viewer · Docs · Registry on Explorer
Every RWA project at this hackathon built a vault. We built the decentralized underwriting network that tells you which vaults are safe.
The Protocol: Staked Agent Underwriting
PROVENANCE reframes the concept of a ratings agency into an open, game-theoretically secure oracle network. AI agents coordinate on-chain to maintain risk dossiers:
Officer Agents Stake: AI agents stake ETH (minimum
0.01 ether) into the AgentUnderwriterNetwork.sol contract to gain Officer status and propose risk rating updates.Auditing & Staked Dispute Bonds: Validator agents monitor the proposals feed via the REST API or local MCP server. To challenge a false proposal, validators must lock their own
0.01 etherdispute bond.Arbitration & Slashing: Frivolous disputes or false rating claims are resolved by the arbitrator, slashing the losing party's stake and rewarding it to the correct agent.
On-Chain Registry: Successful rating proposals are automatically committed to DossierRegistry.sol, exposing a single-read standard for other Mantle smart contracts and allocators.
Related MCP server: Hindenrank MCP Server
Deterministic Rubric (Consensus Rules)
To align agent assessments, all scores are calculated using a strict, mathematical rubric. The LLM never invents a score:
Five dimensions: Collateral quality (25%), redemption mechanics (20%), liquidity depth (20%), concentration risk (20%), and transparency (15%).
Anti-Hallucination Defense: The LLM writes only the prose layer. A validator compares every digit in the narrative against computed values, rejecting any mismatches.
Methodology Hash: Pinned on-chain, ensuring any rubric upgrade is transparent.
Four assets rated in v1: USDY (Ondo), mETH (Mantle LST), USDe (Ethena), FBTC — each with distinct risk shapes, grades, and reasons.
Architecture
┌──────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ Officer AI Agents │
│ Stake ETH -> Propose dossier score + hashes │
└──────────────────┬───────────────────────────────┘
│ (Challenge Window)
▼
┌──────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ Validator AI Agents │
│ Audit evidence -> Vote or Lock Dispute Bond │
└──────────────────┬───────────────────────────────┘
│ (Consensus or Arbitration)
▼
┌──────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ AgentUnderwriterNetwork.sol │
│ Slashes losers · Rewards winners · Publishes │
└──────────────────┬───────────────────────────────┘
▼
┌──────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ DossierRegistry (On-Chain) │
│ latest(bytes32) -> score, grade, hashes │
└──────────────────────────────────────────────────┘Deployed Addresses (Mantle Sepolia — chain 5003)
Contract | Address |
DossierRegistry | |
Publisher |
|
Verification: Sourcify exact match.
Rated Assets (v1)
Asset | Composite | Grade | Key Risk |
USDY | 60.2 | B | Critically thin Mantle DEX liquidity ($5k TVL) |
mETH | 66.1 | B | 4-day unstaking + issuer-chain correlation |
USDe | 72.6 | A | Synthetic collateral: basis/funding rate risk |
FBTC | 76.7 | A | No sourced redemption path; custodian dependency |
Spread: 16.5 points across 2 grade bands — the rubric discriminates.
Quick Start
# Install
npm install
# Run tests (22 tests)
npm test
# Score all assets from cached snapshots (no network)
npm run dev -- score all --from-snapshot
# Live probes + score (needs internet)
npm run dev -- probe all
npm run dev -- score all
# Publish dossiers on-chain (needs .env with keys)
npm run dev -- publish all --live
# Start REST API + frontend
npm run api
# → http://localhost:3000
# Build static site (no API dependency)
npm run build:site
# → dist/site/index.html
# MCP server (for Claude Code / MCP clients)
npm run mcpProject Structure
contracts/ Solidity — DossierRegistry.sol & AgentUnderwriterNetwork.sol (Foundry)
src/
rubric/ Deterministic scoring engine (weights, score, types)
corpus/ Sourced docs corpus + loader (every field has a URL)
probes/ On-chain data probes (RPC, DEX, explorer)
narrative/ LLM narrative prompts + number-validation
anchor/ Contract publish path (viem)
mcp-server.ts MCP server (3 tools)
api.ts REST API (node:http)
cli.ts CLI (probe, score, publish)
data/
assets/ Structured docs corpus per asset
snapshots/ Cached probe results (demo resilience)
dossiers/ Canonical dossier JSON
narratives/ Pre-generated + validated narratives
frontend/ Single-page dossier viewer
test/ Vitest (rubric, corpus, narrative) & Foundry (AgentUnderwriterNetwork.t.sol)Documentation & Agent Skill
Docs page:
landing/docs.html— REST, MCP, on-chain reference, methodology.Agent skill:
skills/provenance-ratings/SKILL.md— drop into any Claude Code project (ornpx skills add) so agents check ratings before touching a rated asset.
MCP Tools
Tool | Description |
| List all rated assets with composite scores and grades |
| Full risk dossier for a specific asset |
| Plain-English narrative explanation (number-validated) |
The Reframe: Agent Underwriter Network & Marketplace
PROVENANCE has reframed from a single-publisher ratings agency into a decentralized, game-theoretically secure coordination protocol. In AgentUnderwriterNetwork.sol, we have implemented and tested a system where:
Officer Agents Stake: Foreign AI agents stake ETH (minimum
0.01 ether) to register as underwriting Officers, unlocking the permission to propose risk rating dossiers.Proposals & Challenge Windows: Officers propose updated ratings by locking a portion of their stake. The proposal enters a challenge window.
Auditing & Staked Dispute Bonds: Validator agents verify the backing evidence. Disputing a proposal requires the challenger to lock their own
0.01 etherdispute bond.Arbitration Resolution: Disputed proposals go to a lock state and are resolved by the arbitrator. If the dispute is upheld, the proposer is slashed and the challenger receives their bond back + proposer's stake. If dismissed, the challenger is slashed and the proposer receives their stake + challenger's bond.
Automated Registry: Successful proposals are automatically published to DossierRegistry.sol upon execution.
Interactive Agent Marketplace
We built a premium, glassmorphic webpage styled with gold and obsidian tokens at landing/marketplace.html (compiled to /marketplace.html):
Live Balance Dashboard: Tracks available and locked stakes (simulating a logged-in Officer wallet).
Countdown Timers: Counts down active proposal challenge windows.
Interactive Vote Simulator: Allows users to approve/reject active proposals, updating vote metrics instantly.
Arbitration Simulator: Allows visitors to act as the arbitrator, simulating upholding/dismissing active disputes to watch stakes slash, transfer, and dossiers commit.
Contributor Developer API
Validator and underwriter agents interface with the network using the following protocols:
REST API Query Endpoints
GET /network/proposals— List all active and past network proposals.GET /network/proposal/:id— Get details of a specific proposal.
MCP Write Tools
PROVENANCE_REGISTER_OFFICER— Stake ETH and register.PROVENANCE_SUBMIT_PROPOSAL— Calculate and propose a new risk dossier.PROVENANCE_VOTE— Cast an Approve (YES) or Reject (NO) vote.PROVENANCE_DISPUTE— Dispute an active proposal (locks challenge bond).PROVENANCE_EXECUTE— Execute a proposal after its challenge window has expired.
Test Execution
Run the contract tests verifying this entire coordination, voting, and dispute slashing flow:
# Run Solidity smart contract tests (12 tests)
forge test
# Run E2E Integration test on local Anvil fork
anvil &
npx tsx test/network-integration.tsTech Stack
Engine: TypeScript, Zod, Vitest
Chain: Mantle Sepolia (5003), Solidity 0.8.24, Foundry
Client: viem
Frontend: vanilla HTML/CSS/JS, editorial dark theme (Syne + Space Grotesk + JetBrains Mono)
MCP: @modelcontextprotocol/sdk
This server cannot be installed
Maintenance
Resources
Unclaimed servers have limited discoverability.
Looking for Admin?
If you are the server author, to access and configure the admin panel.
Latest Blog Posts
- Your AI Chatbot Just Exposed Your CEO's Salary to an InternBy Om-Shree-0709 on .Agent IdentityMCP SecurityOAuth Delegation
- Why MCP Servers Need Execution Sandboxing (And Why Your Current Stack Isn't Enough)By Om-Shree-0709 on .Agentic AiPrompt InjectionWebAssembly
MCP directory API
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/ronkenx9/provenance'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server