Skip to main content
Glama
ronisaguey-ux

layajev-mcp

by ronisaguey-ux
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
Python
Hybrid

Related Servers

Alternatives to layajev-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • jev-mcp

      jkudish
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables agents to verify claims against cited evidence, screen content for prompt injection and relevance before reading it, and rank candidates by meaning, all with calibrated probability verdicts.
      12
      3,375 npm
      536
      MIT
    • jevbook MCP by jevbook

      jevbook MCPofficial

      jevbook
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables agents to fact-check claims, conduct verified research, make typed decisions with calibrated probabilities, and scan token risks through a hosted server with no API key required.
      MIT

    • snapdec

      aktonay
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Gives any coding agent a shared local decision layer for classifying, checking, scoring, and ranking items with calibrated probabilities, plus deterministic project fact discovery, all through one install. Every answer is advisory and marked auto or review, so the host agent can abstain or escalate instead of guessing.
      159 PyPI
      2
      Apache 2.0

    • poordjaevin

      Icaro0310
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Exposes local MCP tools for typed, calibrated LLM decisions — gating risky actions, yes/no judging, classification, ordinal rating, and multi-question decisions in one pass. Runs on the model Devin's CLI already provides via ACP (or a fully offline local backend), so agents get calibrated confidence with no extra API key, no Ollama, and no waitlist.
      137 PyPI
      6
      MIT
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    A4.2/5.0

    Scored across 5 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool has a clearly distinct purpose: backend_status diagnoses engine availability, decide handles general ambiguous choices, decide_many batches independent questions, triage_options narrows large option sets, and judge handles yes/no risk checks. The descriptions emphasize when to use each, making misselection unlikely.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    All tool names use snake_case and are concise, but they mix verbs (decide, judge) and nouns (backend_status, triage_options). The pattern is mostly verb-driven, with backend_status being the outlier as a status query, but the style is consistent and readable.

    Tool Count5/5

    Five tools is well-scoped for a decision-support server. Each tool covers a distinct aspect of the decision lifecycle (status, single decision, batch, triage, binary risk), and none feels redundant or missing.

    Completeness4/5

    The surface covers the core decision-making workflow: checking engine availability, making single or batched decisions, handling large option sets, and binary risk assessment. Minor gaps like a history or explanation tool could be added, but the current set is functionally complete for its stated purpose.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources