Skip to main content
Glama
mcp-github-gitlab-pr-security-and-compliance-reviewer

mcp-github-gitlab-pr-security-and-compliance-reviewer

Related Servers

Alternatives to mcp-github-gitlab-pr-security-and-compliance-reviewer

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables AI assistants to audit git diffs, scan for leaked secrets and unsafe APIs, detect breaking changes, triage issues, generate changelogs, and assess repository hygiene through native stdio JSON-RPC tools.
      6
      Apache 2.0
    • A
      license
      D
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to perform security audits on pull request diffs by detecting secrets, dangerous code patterns, and new dependencies, outputting structured JSON for generating PR review comments.
      1
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables AI-powered, zero-trust code review with multiple models, supporting single files, git diffs, and multiple files, with security, performance, and architecture checks across 10+ languages.
      15
      MIT
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables local security scanning and compliance gap analysis for code and text, detecting secrets, PII, and OWASP vulnerabilities, and assessing readiness across major frameworks like NCA, ISO 27001, NIST CSF, and SOC 2.
      -

    TDQS

    A3.7/5.0

    Scored across 4 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    The tools target mostly distinct outputs: secret scanning with .env replacements, full diff audit, inline review suggestions, and SARIF export. There is minor potential overlap because review_git_diff performs a broad security audit that may include secret-related findings, but the specialized replacement-diff behavior of scan_diff_for_secrets helps distinguish it.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All tool names use snake_case and begin with a clear action verb: scan, review, generate, export. The object/context phrasing varies slightly but remains predictable and readable.

    Tool Count5/5

    Four tools are well-scoped for a focused PR security and compliance review workflow. Each tool has a distinct role in the pipeline: detect secrets, audit the diff, generate suggestions, and export findings.

    Completeness4/5

    The surface covers the core review flow from diff input through secret detection, audit, remediation suggestions, and SARIF export. Minor gaps remain around directly fetching PRs/diffs or posting review comments back to GitHub/GitLab, but these may be outside the intended diff-processing scope.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo recent community issues