Skip to main content
Glama
romudille-bit

AgentPay x402 — Economic-intelligence layer for AI Agents

whale_activity

Detect large wallet movements for any token to spot potential whale activity. Returns transfer details, USD value, and total volume.

Instructions

Detect recent large wallet movements for a token (whale tracking)

Use when: You need to detect large token transfers that may signal institutional moves, accumulation, or sell-offs. Returns: large_transfers[] with from, to, amount, usd_value, minutes_ago; total_volume_usd Example response: {"token": "USDC", "large_transfers": [{"from": "0xabc...1234", "to": "0xdef...5678", "amount": 5000000.0, "usd_value": 5000000.0, "minutes_ago": 12}, {"from": "0x111...aaaa", "to": "0x222...bbbb", "amount": 2500000.0, "usd_value": 2500000.0, "minutes_ago": 34}], "total_volume_usd": 7500000.0, "source": "etherscan"}

Price: $0.000 USDC per call

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
tokenYesToken symbol to track
min_usdNoMinimum transaction size in USD
Behavior3/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations provided; description states return structure and gives an example, but lacks details on authentication, rate limits, or edge cases.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness4/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Description is reasonably concise and front-loaded, but includes a price line that may be extraneous for an AI agent.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness4/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

No output schema, but the example response clarifies return format; description is sufficiently complete for a simple data retrieval tool.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Input schema covers 100% of parameters with descriptions; the tool description adds little beyond the example usage, so baseline score is appropriate.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description specifies a clear verb ('detect') and resource ('recent large wallet movements for a token'), and distinguishes well from sibling tools like orderbook_depth or fear_greed_index.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines4/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Provides explicit guidance on when to use ('when you need to detect large token transfers that may signal institutional moves'), but does not mention when not to use or alternatives.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Install Server

Other Tools

Latest Blog Posts

MCP directory API

We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.

curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/romudille-bit/agentpay'

If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server