tidy-core
Related Servers
Alternatives to tidy-core
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceEnables AI coding environments to enforce engineering governance through MCP tools and resources for init, check, route, and review workflows.9 npm2MIT
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceMCP server that exposes a design system and UX rulebook as tools, enabling AI to generate UI consistent with your design tokens, components, layout rules, accessibility guidelines, and templates. It also provides a review tool to score UI proposals against the design system.-
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceProvides governed MCP tools for a controlled, AI-assisted asset-change pipeline, featuring natural-language requests, mandatory approvals, execution-time revalidation, and complete audit.-
- AlicenseAqualityCmaintenanceArchitecture governance MCP server for AI-built codebases, enabling health checks, template management, and project scaffolding with migration support.57 npmMIT
- AlicenseAqualityAmaintenanceRead-only MCP server that exposes a design system's tokens, components, conventions, and deprecations as queryable tools, enabling agents to look up canonical values, assess change impact, and detect hardcoded value drift.81 npmMIT
- FlicenseAqualityAmaintenanceGovernance/control plane for MCP-enabled coding-agent workflows with validation, findings, approvals, budgets, and proof bundles.5511-
TDQS
Scored across 13 tools
Tools like tidy_plan and tidy_apply have clear separation (read vs. execute), and tidy_status/tidy_target handle connection vs. targeting. However, some tools like tidy_health, tidy_impact, and tidy_cleanup all involve analysis of the design system, and their distinct purposes might not be immediately obvious without reading descriptions closely, though descriptions do help.
All tools use the pattern 'tidy_' prefix followed by a lowercase verb or noun in snake_case, e.g., tidy_status, tidy_target, tidy_plan, tidy_apply. This is perfectly consistent and predictable.
13 tools is within the recommended range. However, 8 of them are marked as not implemented yet, which might make the server feel thin in terms of actual functionality, but the planned surface is of appropriate size for a comprehensive design system management toolkit.
The implemented tools cover status, targeting, context, planning, and applying changes, which are core operations. However, many permanent capabilities like adoption, drift, health, impact, cleanup, decisions, and gating are not yet implemented, leaving notable gaps in the intended functionality.