Skip to main content
Glama

lom_set

Idempotent

Set any Live Object Model property by dotted path and receive before, after, clamped, and changed status to verify the write.

Instructions

Write a property value by LOM path and return verification read-back.

The generic write, for the property no dedicated tool covers. Prefer
set_parameter for a device knob, set_mix for a mixer control and set_tempo for
the tempo: each validates against the catalog before writing, which this does
not. Use lom_call for a method, which is not reachable as a property, and
lom_batch to send several writes in one round trip.

Returns:
    Dictionary reporting requested, before, after, clamped, and changed status.
    For a device parameter it also carries ``display`` and ``is_quantized``.

Note:
    Live does not accept an out-of-range value silently, however often that is given
    as the reason to read back. It refuses out loud and stores nothing, so
    ``...volume.value = 1.4`` answers
    ``live_error "Invalid value. Check the parameters range with min/max"`` and leaves
    0.85 standing. A tempo of 5000 and a panning of 5 are refused the same way.

    What the read-back really catches is quantised snap.
    ``<Compressor>.parameters[10].value = 0.4`` (Model: Peak / RMS / Expand)
    stored 0 and reported ``clamped: true, read_back: "clamped", display:
    "Peak", is_quantized: true``. A caller who asks for a value between two steps
    gets a different one and is told nowhere else.

    Three more, measured separately. A write can apply asynchronously, so the
    first read is stale and comes back ``read_back: "not_observed"``, which is
    not ``clamped`` and not a failure. A method call has no read-back at all.
    And Live ignores an unknown property name silently, reporting success for a
    write that did nothing, so check ``changed`` rather than ``ok``.

    A collection (``song.tracks``, ``device.parameters``) cannot be assigned.
    Address an element and set one of its properties.

    A Live object cannot travel as a plain value. Where a property really holds
    one (``song.view.selected_track``, ``song.view.selected_scene``,
    ``song.view.detail_clip``, ``browser.hotswap_target``, ``clip.groove``, and
    on a device ``input_routing_type`` and ``input_routing_channel``) pass
    ``value={"__path__": "song.tracks[2]"}``, resolved through the same guards as
    a lom_call argument (protocol section 5.4). Handed a plain JSON value the
    first five answer ``not_settable``.
    The two routing properties, a compressor's sidechain source and its tap
    point, take their reference out of ``<device>.available_input_routing_types``
    and ``...available_input_routing_channels``, never a name string, because
    RoutingType carries ``category`` and ``display_name`` read-only and an
    ``attached_object`` pointing at the Track.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
pathYesSettable dotted LOM path, e.g. 'song.tempo' or 'song.tracks[0].mixer_device.volume.value'. Note the trailing ``.value``: a mixer control is a DeviceParameter object and the number lives one level inside it.
valueYesThe value to store. A number, string or boolean for a scalar property; a reference dict {'__path__': 'song.tracks[2]'} for a property whose value is itself a Live object.

Output Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault

No arguments

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections. Dates show when Glama detected each change.

  1. Changed2 schema fields changedv0.1.1
    • addedInput schema / properties / path / description
      Added value: +"Settable dotted LOM path, e.g. 'song.tempo' or 'song.tracks[0].mixer_device.volume.value'. Note the trailing ``.value``: a mixer control is a DeviceParameter object and the number lives one level inside it."
    • addedInput schema / properties / value / description
      Added value: +"The value to store. A number, string or boolean for a scalar property; a reference dict {'__path__': 'song.tracks[2]'} for a property whose value is itself a Live object."
  2. First observedv0.1.0

TDQS

A5/5.0
Behavior5/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Beyond annotations (readOnlyHint: false, idempotentHint: true, destructiveHint: false), the description discloses major behavioral traits: Live rejects out-of-range values loudly, quantized values clamp, writes can apply asynchronously causing stale reads, unknown properties are silently ignored, collections are not assignable, and object-valued properties need special __path__ references. No contradiction with annotations exists.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is long but tightly organized: purpose, sibling routing, return shape, then a sequence of concrete behavior warnings with examples. Each paragraph earns its place by preventing a distinct failure mode. The most actionable guidance is front-loaded.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness5/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the tool's complexity, the description is remarkably complete. It covers the return dictionary fields, device-parameter extras, out-of-range behavior, quantized snapping, async writes, silent failures, collection assignment, object-valued properties, and routing-property constraints. With an output schema present and no missing operational guidance, nothing critical is left undocumented.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters5/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Although schema coverage is 100%, the description substantially enriches parameter understanding: it explains the trailing .value convention for mixer controls, the plain scalar forms of value, the {'__path__': ...} dict form for Live-object properties, and the routing-property reference restrictions. These are essential semantics not inferable from the schema alone.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description opens with a specific verb and resource: 'Write a property value by LOM path and return verification read-back.' It then names the sibling tools it is not (set_parameter, set_mix, set_tempo, lom_call, lom_batch), making the tool's role as the generic property write unambiguous.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines5/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description explicitly tells the agent when to avoid this tool: prefer set_parameter for a device knob, set_mix for a mixer control, set_tempo for tempo, lom_call for a method, and lom_batch for multiple writes. This is direct routing guidance with no reliance on inference.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Latest Blog Posts

MCP directory API

We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.

curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/romanstark/live-maestro'

If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server