Skip to main content
Glama
romanstark

Dorico Maestro

get_status

Read-onlyIdempotent

Check Dorico's current application state—active mode, note input, selection, and undo availability—to verify whether a command took effect without sending additional commands.

Instructions

Return Dorico's current pushed application status snapshot.

The state of the application rather than of the music: which mode is active,
whether note input is running, whether anything is selected, whether an undo is
available.

Returns:
    Result dictionary carrying the merged status snapshot.

Note:
    Dorico pushes status as deltas and this is the accumulated snapshot of them,
    so it costs nothing to read and needs no command to be sent.

    This is also how to check whether a command that answered kOK actually took
    effect, since kOK only says the UI queue accepted it (docs/protocol.md,
    'Command Acceptance vs Effect'). For the properties of the selected notes
    rather than the state of the application, use read_selection.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault

No arguments

Output Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault

No arguments

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. First observedv0.1.0

TDQS

A4.8/5.0
Behavior5/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already declare readOnlyHint=true and idempotentHint=true, but the description adds valuable behavior: the status is an accumulated snapshot of pushed deltas, reading it costs nothing, and no command needs to be sent. It also clarifies the kOK acceptance-vs-effect protocol distinction.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness4/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The primary purpose is front-loaded and each section adds meaningful context. The Returns and Note sections are slightly extended but every sentence contributes to correct usage, so it avoids unnecessary padding.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness5/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a zero-parameter read-only snapshot tool with an output schema, the description is complete: it states what is returned, why it is cheap, when to use it, and what it is not for. There is no missing information an agent would need to invoke it correctly.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters4/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The tool has no parameters, so the baseline is 4. The description adds no parameter-specific details, but none are needed since the input schema is empty and schema description coverage is 100%.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description opens with a precise verb and resource: 'Return Dorico's current pushed application status snapshot.' It then specifies what the snapshot contains (mode, note input, selection, undo availability), which clearly distinguishes it from related tools like read_selection.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines5/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

It explicitly explains when to use this tool: to verify whether a command that returned kOK actually took effect. It also directs users to read_selection when they need properties of selected notes rather than application state, providing a clear alternative.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.