Model Price Watch
Related Servers
Alternatives to Model Price Watch
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceToken cost math for LLM API calls: current per-million-token rates for 69 models across 17 providers, with local arithmetic for estimates, comparisons and monthly budgets. Rates are verified and date-stamped.44 npm2MIT
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceEnables users to retrieve live pricing data for AI models across vendors, including input and output prices per 1k tokens, via a simple API.-
- AlicenseAqualityAmaintenanceDaily-verified LLM API pricing dataset (44+ models, CN & global) with a hosted MCP server for live price queries and token cost estimation.2CC BY-4.0
- AlicenseAqualityBmaintenanceGlobal price benchmarking for AI inference across 2,600+ SKUs from 47 vendors. Query live pricing, market indexes, and model specs via 8 tools. Free tier available.860 npmMIT

apipriceindex-mcpofficial
AlicenseAqualityAmaintenanceGives AI agents live, verified LLM API prices from apipriceindex.com, enabling cost estimation, model search, and price lookups with verification metadata.3MIT- FlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceProvides real-time token pricing for AI models, model comparison, cost calculation, and token usage tracking for agents and developers.-
TDQS
Scored across 4 tools
Each tool targets a distinct operation: price ranking (cheapest_models), detailed single-model lookup (get_model_pricing), provider listing (list_providers), and search by name/provider/id (search_models). The only potential overlap—search_models and cheapest_models both return price info—is resolved by the clear ranking vs. lookup distinction.
Three of four names follow a verb_noun pattern (get_model_pricing, list_providers, search_models), while cheapest_models uses an adjective_noun form. This is a minor deviation; all names are snake_case and easily readable.
Four tools cover the core read-only operations for an LLM pricing database without redundancy or bloat. The count is well-scoped for the narrow domain.
The surface covers search, single-model detail, provider listing, and cheapest ranking. Minor gaps include no direct model comparison or standalone capability filtering, though category filtering exists in cheapest_models.