rapid-indexer-mcp
Related Servers
Alternatives to rapid-indexer-mcp
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseAqualityCmaintenanceEnables MCP clients to query Search Analytics metrics, list and inspect properties and sitemaps, and inspect indexed URLs with secure authentication and optional allowlisted write controls.6MIT
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceEnables MCP clients to run Google Search, News, and Local queries and receive structured organic results, news, and local packs as JSON.-
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceAn MCP server that enables interacting with Google's Indexing API, allowing agents to submit URLs to Google for indexing or removal from search results through natural language commands.-
- FlicenseAqualityCmaintenanceEnables users to query Google Search Console and Bing Webmaster data, inspect indexed URLs, submit same-host URLs to IndexNow, and retrieve PageSpeed Insights and CrUX metrics through their MCP client using their own credentials.8-
- AlicenseAqualityBmaintenanceEnables MCP clients to retrieve Search Console search analytics, find multilingual question-shaped queries and SEO opportunities, inspect URLs, and view or manage sitemaps with server-side date resolution and comparisons.6MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceEnables MCP clients to work with webmaster search analytics, sitemaps, and URL inspection once the Google API integration is implemented, though the current scaffold does not yet call Google.302 npmApache 2.0
TDQS
Scored across 12 tools
Each tool targets a distinct action or resource: account, pricing, cost estimation, indexing submission, index checking, task listing, task details, per-link results, traffic campaigns, CTR campaigns, search engine listing, and health checks. The few similar-looking tools (create_traffic_campaign vs. create_ctr_campaign, get_task vs. get_task_links) are clearly differentiated by their descriptions and intended workflow.
All tool names follow a consistent verb_noun pattern in lower_snake_case, such as get_account, submit_urls_for_indexing, list_tasks, and create_ctr_campaign. The naming clearly indicates both the action and the resource, making the set predictable and easy to navigate.
With 12 tools, the server is well-scoped for its purpose. Each tool earns its place by covering account management, pricing/cost estimation, task creation, task monitoring, and campaign setup without unnecessary bloat.
The tool set covers the core lifecycle thoroughly: estimate costs, submit indexing or index-check tasks, poll task status, and inspect per-URL results. Minor gaps exist, such as no dedicated campaign performance metrics beyond generic task polling and no cancellation/update operations, but these can be worked around and do not severely hinder the main workflows.