delete_indexer_by_id

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already declare destructiveHint=true and readOnlyHint=false. The description adds no extra behavioral context, such as irreversibility or side effects, and merely restates the deletion action. It does not contradict annotations but contributes nothing beyond them.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is extremely concise, with no superfluous content, and front-loads the action. It is easy to scan, but the brevity comes at the cost of missing necessary context. Still, it is efficiently structured for its minimal length.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a simple delete-by-id operation with annotations covering destructiveness, the description is minimally adequate. It lacks guidance on when to use this versus bulk delete and does not mention any special behaviors or error conditions. The output schema exists, so return values are covered, but the description still feels incomplete for an agent.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The description identifies 'id' as a path parameter, which is not explicitly stated in the schema (which only gives type integer). This adds minor semantic context about parameter placement. However, it does not explain the meaning of the id or any constraints, so value is limited.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

States the verb 'Delete' and resource 'Indexer' clearly, making the action unambiguous. The name includes 'by_id' which distinguishes it from bulk operations, though the description does not explicitly mention this distinction. It is specific enough for an agent to know what it does.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description provides no guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives like delete_indexer_bulk. It only gives the HTTP method and path, leaving the agent to infer usage context without any explicit conditions or exclusions.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.