delete_user_by_user_id

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

The annotations already declare destructiveHint=true and readOnlyHint=false, and the description's 'Delete' wording is consistent with those signals, so there is no contradiction. However, the description adds no additional behavioral context such as whether deletion is permanent, whether related data is removed, or what permissions are required.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is extremely compact and front-loaded: a one-sentence purpose, the endpoint, and a minimal args block. There is no filler or redundant explanation.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a single-parameter delete operation with annotations covering the destructive profile and an output schema present, this is minimally adequate. It states the action, endpoint, and parameter, but it leaves out useful operational caveats such as irreversibility, cascading effects, or authorization requirements.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The schema has 0% description coverage and only provides the parameter name, type, and required status. The description adds that user_id is a path parameter, which is useful for invocation, but it does not clarify the meaning or expected value of the ID beyond what the parameter name already implies.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The opening sentence 'Delete user by ID' states a specific verb and resource, and the explicit endpoint DELETE /api/v1/user/{userId} reinforces the action. This clearly distinguishes the tool from sibling get/update/create user tools.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance is given about when to use this tool versus alternatives like get_user_by_user_id, update_user_by_user_id, or list_user. There are no prerequisites, exclusions, or conditions, so the agent must infer the appropriate context from the operation name alone.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.