Skip to main content
Glama
rollecode

Audiobookshelf MCP server

by rollecode

create_collections_by_id_batch_add

Idempotent

Add multiple items to an existing collection in one batch request, using the collection ID and a payload that matches the API schema.

Instructions

Create or act on batch add.

POST /api/collections/{id}/batch/add

Args: id: Path parameter. body: Request payload. Read the matching GET or the /schema endpoint first to see the fields this resource expects.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
idYes
bodyYes

Output Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
resultYes

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. First observedv1.0.0

TDQS

C2.1/5.0
Behavior2/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

The description provides no behavioral details beyond the annotations. It doesn't mention idempotency (though annotations do), response format, or any side effects. It does not state what happens on success or failure, or whether authentication is required.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness3/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is concise and follows a clear structure with endpoint and args. However, the opening sentence 'Create or act on batch add' is vague and could be clearer. It is not overly verbose, but it sacrifices clarity for brevity.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness2/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the operation's complexity (POST with a body), the description is insufficient. It doesn't explain what the batch add operation entails, what the body should contain, or what the expected outcome is. The existence of an output schema mitigates the need to describe return values, but the core purpose remains undefined.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters2/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The schema has 0% description coverage, and the description only labels id as a path parameter and body as a request payload. It directs the user to read the GET/schema endpoint for fields, but does not describe any actual parameters or their meanings.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose2/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description says 'Create or act on batch add' and provides the endpoint, but does not clarify what 'batch add' does. It is not clear whether this adds items to a collection, updates items, or something else. The name and endpoint suggest adding multiple items, but the description lacks a clear verb-resource statement.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines2/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

There is no guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives like create_collections_by_id_batch_remove or create_playlists_by_id_batch_add. The description only instructs to read the GET/schema endpoint for field details, which is a prerequisite, not usage guidance.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Deploy Server

Other Tools