Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to InvoiceLens MCP

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to parse and analyze PDF invoices, including text, field, and table extraction, OCR for scanned documents, ZUGFeRD support, compliance validation, and batch processing via MCP.
      -
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables AI assistants to list and process supplier invoices, run validation and fraud checks, review anomalies, summarize suppliers, and query an invoice DuckDB store through seven read-only MCP tools.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      MCP server that gives AI agents read access to subscription/SaaS invoice history, ingested from Gmail and stored in Postgres and MongoDB, with tools for listing invoices, retrieving PDFs, and summarizing spend.
      441 npm
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents and finance teams to extract structured fields from messy invoices and audit them before payment, applying seven evidence-backed risk rules that catch total/tax mismatches, duplicate invoices, missing fields, future dates, and round amounts, then returning a 0–100 score with a payment link. Exposes four MCP tools over stdio and Streamable HTTP (spec 2025-11-25) plus a web UI, backed by an optional AWS Bedrock or OpenAI-compatible extraction brain that degrades gracefully to a zero-dependency offline engine.
      MIT
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to extract structured data from PDFs with confidence scores and provenance, and to search, review, and correct documents via MCP tools, resources, and prompts.
      -

    TDQS

    A4.2/5.0

    Scored across 5 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    Most tools are clearly distinct: ingest stores documents, extract reads structured fields with validation, company_financials pulls market data, and web_search queries the internet. The only potential confusion pairs are ingest vs. extract (both document-processing) and search_documents vs. web_search, but the descriptions explicitly delineate their roles and cross-reference each other.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    All names are snake_case with a consistent invoicelens_ prefix, and the first three follow a verb_noun pattern (ingest_document, extract_invoice, search_documents). The last two (company_financials, web_search) are noun-based rather than verb-based, a minor deviation from the otherwise predictable scheme.

    Tool Count5/5

    Five tightly scoped tools cover the invoice-analysis workflow from ingestion through extraction, search, and external enrichment. Each tool has a clear, non-redundant job, so nothing feels padded or missing at this scale.

    Completeness4/5

    The core lifecycle is covered: ingest, extract with validation, semantic search, plus financial and web enrichment. Minor gaps exist — no explicit list-documents or delete-document operation, and no batch or export tool, though re-ingesting replaces duplicates and search partly substitutes for listing.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues