No user-submitted related servers found.
Scored across 2 tools
audit_ai_crawlers performs an active site analysis, while list_ai_crawlers is a static reference enumeration of known user agents. The verbs and objects are distinct, and the descriptions reinforce the separation with no realistic chance of misselection.
Both tools follow the same snake_case verb_noun pattern (audit_/list_ + ai_crawlers), sharing the same domain object. Fully predictable and consistent.
Two tools is very thin for a server named OpenGEO, which implies generative-engine-optimization work well beyond a single crawler-access check. Only one functional tool plus one lookup helper leaves most of the apparent scope unaddressed.
The audit covers robots.txt verdicts, llms.txt presence, and a score, which is a coherent core, but there is no path to remediation (generating robots.txt rules or llms.txt), no inspection of llms.txt or sitemap contents, and no page-level content audit. Agents hit a dead end after diagnosis.