Skip to main content
Glama
Sign In
Safari Screenshot MCP Server

Safari Screenshot MCP Server

by rogerheykoop
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
TypeScript
Local

Related Servers

Alternatives to Safari Screenshot MCP Server

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • screenshot

      therealMrFunGuy
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Provides tools to capture pixel-perfect website screenshots as images or PDF. Supports configurable viewport, full-page capture, CSS injection, and returns either viewable images or base64-encoded content.
      MIT

    • MCP Safari Server

      stevenayl
      -
      license
      A
      quality
      Not graded
      maintenance
      A server that provides AI assistants programmatic control of Safari browser on macOS for web automation, testing, and debugging.
      16
      1
      -

    • screenshot-website-fast

      tgfwkkojct
      F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables capturing full-page or CSS-selector-targeted webpage screenshots via a headless browser, automatically tiling large pages into 1072x1072 chunks sized for AI vision models. It also supports timed screencasts with JavaScript injection, exporting frames as PNGs or animated WebP files.
      -
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    B3.1/5.0

    Scored across 1 tool

    Disambiguation5/5

    With only one tool, there is no possibility of ambiguity or overlap between tools. The tool's purpose is singular and clearly defined, making it impossible for an agent to misselect between non-existent alternatives.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    A single tool inherently has perfect naming consistency as there are no other tools to compare against. The name 'take_screenshot' follows a clear verb_noun pattern, which would be consistent if more tools existed.

    Tool Count2/5

    One tool is too few for most server purposes, as it severely limits functionality and scope. While it matches the server's name, a single screenshot tool feels thin and incomplete for a broader screenshot or browser automation domain.

    Completeness2/5

    The tool surface is severely incomplete for a screenshot server. There are obvious gaps such as no options for different screenshot types (e.g., full-page, element-specific), no configuration settings, and no related operations like listing or managing screenshots.

    Resources